Total of 12 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri 15 May 2020 12:53:04 AM EDT
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
16.67% |2 | 18.16% | 104749 | o...@delong.com
16.67% |2 | 17.07% |98426 | takoka...@gmail
he
> appropriate section in the Section 8 of the NRPM. Organizations should be
> informed of how their activities in the transfer market will impact them in
> reference to applying to the waitlist. These changes were to make it easier
> for staff and the community to understand these requirements.
>
This is great feedback. Thank you everyone. I agree with removing
"summarily" is an easy correction and is probably an unnecessary word.
Thanks all.
Kat
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:59 PM Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> Makes sense to me. +1
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 1:50 PM Mike Burns wrote:
>
>> I
Makes sense to me. +1
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 1:50 PM Mike Burns wrote:
> I would support it with the removal of the pompous and meaningless word
> “summarily”.
>
> I like a clean NRPM.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ARIN-PPML *On Behalf Of *Chris
> Woodfield
> *Sent:* Thursday, Ma
I support this proposal as written.
—
Brian
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:56 AM Kat Hunter wrote:
> After making adjustments to the text, ARIN staff and legal conducted a new
> staff and legal review on 2019-1. You can view the updated review here:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2
I would support it with the removal of the pompous and meaningless word
“summarily”.
I like a clean NRPM.
Regards,
Mike
From: ARIN-PPML On Behalf Of Chris Woodfield
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 1:40 PM
To: Owen DeLong ; ARIN-PPML List
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Revised and Reverted t
I support as written, but agree that the word can be removed from the proposal
without changing its intent, so happy to see it removed.
-Chris
> On May 14, 2020, at 9:49 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> I don’t construe it that way, but I have no objection to either of Scott’s
> suggestions, either
I don’t construe it that way, but I have no objection to either of Scott’s
suggestions, either.
My concern is for the end effect of the proposed policy which is the same with
any of the proposed wordings.
Owen
> On May 14, 2020, at 09:10 , Scott Leibrand wrote:
>
> "Summarily" seems punitiv
"Summarily" seems punitive, and doesn't seem necessary in this context.
Perhaps just remove it and just leave "will be removed from the waitlist"?
Or replace it with something like "immediately".
-Scott
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:50 AM Owen DeLong wrote:
> I support this addition and support the
I support this addition and support the policy with the addition.
Owen
> On May 14, 2020, at 08:37, Fernando Frediani wrote:
>
>
> I support this proposal.
> It's fair to everybody and helps avoid fraud.
>
> Regards
> Fernando
>
>> On 14/05/2020 11:56, Kat Hunter wrote:
>> After making ad
I support this proposal.
It's fair to everybody and helps avoid fraud.
Regards
Fernando
On 14/05/2020 11:56, Kat Hunter wrote:
After making adjustments to the text, ARIN staff and legal conducted a
new staff and legal review on 2019-1. You can view the updated review
here:
https://www.arin.ne
After making adjustments to the text, ARIN staff and legal conducted a new
staff and legal review on 2019-1. You can view the updated review here:
https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_1/#staff-and-legal-review-30-april-2020
.
It has been suggested that
"It is worth noting that this D
12 matches
Mail list logo
