Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2020-3: IPv6 Nano-allocations

2020-07-22 Thread Brian Jones
+1 Leif's recommended wording. — Brian bjo...@vt.edu On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:34 PM Leif Sawyer wrote: > "Partial returns of any IPv6 allocation that results in less than a /36 of > holding are not permitted, [...]" > > > This would seem to address Albert's issue, and remove the uncertainty

[arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2020-5: Clarify and Update Requirements for Allocations to Downstream Customers

2020-07-22 Thread ARIN
The following Draft Policy has been revised: * ARIN-2020-5: Clarify and Update Requirements for Allocations to Downstream Customers Revised text is below and can be found at: https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2020_5/ You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The