Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2020-6: Allowance for IPv4 Allocation “Swap” Transactions via 8.3 Specified Transfers and 8.4 Inter-RIR Transfers

2020-12-15 Thread Fernando Frediani
Answers below: On 15/12/2020 16:38, Owen DeLong wrote: Dear ARIN community, We (the AC, and specifically the proposal shepherds) need to solicit some additional feedback in order to better know the community’s desire with regards to this policy. Specifically, we’d like to ask the following qu

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2020-6: Allowance for IPv4 Allocation “Swap” Transactions via 8.3 Specified Transfers and 8.4 Inter-RIR Transfers

2020-12-15 Thread Mike Burns
Hi Owen, I thought I had replied to this, but maybe not. Answer below your snippet. "Playing devils advocate for a moment, how would we prevent either of the following abuse scenarios: 1. This allows virtually any ORG to acquire 1.125x their current holdings and use all of the address

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2020-8: Clarify and Update 4.2.1.2 Annual Renewal Fee

2020-12-15 Thread Martin Hannigan
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:49 PM Joe Provo wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 02:42:45PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote: > > [really big snips] > > > > > > > > In the interest of both simplification and striving to eliminate > > > the fee or contract details within policy, I'm a fan of Mr Woodfield's > >

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2020-8: Clarify and Update 4.2.1.2 Annual Renewal Fee

2020-12-15 Thread Joe Provo
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 02:42:45PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote: > [really big snips] > > > > > In the interest of both simplification and striving to eliminate > > the fee or contract details within policy, I'm a fan of Mr Woodfield's > > suggestion for simple generalization. What do folks think abo

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2020-8: Clarify and Update 4.2.1.2 Annual Renewal Fee

2020-12-15 Thread Owen DeLong
[really big snips] > > In the interest of both simplification and striving to eliminate > the fee or contract details within policy, I'm a fan of Mr Woodfield's > suggestion for simple generalization. What do folks think about: > > 2.X Registration Services Agreement (RSA) > > Number resources

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2020-6: Allowance for IPv4 Allocation “Swap” Transactions via 8.3 Specified Transfers and 8.4 Inter-RIR Transfers

2020-12-15 Thread Owen DeLong
> On Dec 15, 2020, at 1:32 PM, Mike Burns wrote: > > Hi Owen, > > Thanks for spurring conversation on this proposal. > > In my experience those who frequently want to acquire a small block to > renumber into are holders of much-larger blocks who can realize higher prices > if they sell thei

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2020-6: Allowance for IPv4 Allocation “Swap” Transactions via 8.3 Specified Transfers and 8.4 Inter-RIR Transfers

2020-12-15 Thread Mike Burns
Hi Owen, Thanks for spurring conversation on this proposal. In my experience those who frequently want to acquire a small block to renumber into are holders of much-larger blocks who can realize higher prices if they sell their much-larger block intact. The market is rewarding larger block size

[arin-ppml] ARIN-2020-6: Allowance for IPv4 Allocation “Swap” Transactions via 8.3 Specified Transfers and 8.4 Inter-RIR Transfers

2020-12-15 Thread Owen DeLong
Dear ARIN community, We (the AC, and specifically the proposal shepherds) need to solicit some additional feedback in order to better know the community’s desire with regards to this policy. Specifically, we’d like to ask the following questions: 1a. Do you feel that we should place an uppe