Further, since we seem to be doing an s/assignment/allocation/g we might want to do that here as well?
Owen > On Mar 26, 2024, at 13:33, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:14 PM ARIN <i...@arin.net> wrote: >> Policy Statement: >> >> Current policy: When possible subsequent assignments will result it the >> expansion of an existing assignment by one or more nibble boundaries as >> justified. >> >> We propose that the text should be: When possible subsequent assignments >> will result in the expansion of an existing assignment by one or more nibble >> boundaries as justified. > > For clarity: "result IT the expansion" is replaced with "result IN the > expansion." > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > -- > William Herrin > b...@herrin.us > https://bill.herrin.us/ > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
