On 06/05/2014 08:26 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
> David said: The full phrase I used was "legitimization of this market on an
> unlimited scale" and it was intentional.
>
> "unlimited" as intentionally used, then, is a straw man argument in the
> context of 2014-14.
> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposa
On 6/4/2014 10:57 PM, Elvis Velea wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 05/06/14 04:50, David Miller wrote:
>> Proper stewardship of the ARIN function demands that ARIN policy
>> adjust to what happens in the market. It's not the other way around,
>> if only because that&#x
On 6/4/2014 10:41 PM, Elvis Velea wrote:
> Hi Cathy,
>
> On 05/06/14 04:31, CJ Aronson wrote:
>> Let's be clear.. the RIPE NCC will only give a one-time /22 for your
>> 1600 Euros/year. RIPE has always made applicants prove a business
>> presense in the region and I believe that's what the
>>
> We're going to be a cross-roads very soon. ARIN is going to exhaust,
> and network operators will be unable to obtain additional IPv4 address
> blocks from ARIN. At that point, the most obvious solution for IPv4
> needs will be the market.
Discounting the other obvious solutions of IPv6, IPv6,
On 6/4/2014 9:10 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>
> On 6/4/14, 5:13 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> It is, however, equally obvious that a sizable portion of the
>> community, not merely myself, does not want to eliminate the needs test.
>
> For the extremely limited version of "the community" which con
On 4/18/2014 4:32 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Jason Schiller wrote:
>> The ARIN community continues to suggest there is no hardware reason that
>> would prevent support of 4-byte ASNs. The community desires that we use up
>> the 2-byte ASNs and continue to send
n.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
--
-__
David Miller
dmil...@tiggee.com
___
PPML
Y
