Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2024-8: Restrict the Largest Initial IPv6 Allocation to /20

2024-06-28 Thread Michael Greenup via ARIN-PPML
Greetings to the list! David, you incorrectly assume this is IPv4 thinking instead of what it really is - a desire to streamline the process while providing reasonable limits. It is true these limits were based on my own observations and belief a maximum of a /28 initial allocation with _1 Million

Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2024-8: Restrict the Largest Initial IPv6 Allocation to /20

2024-06-28 Thread Michael Greenup via ARIN-PPML
Greetings to the List! Thank you Tyler for your clarifications, though I am curious why /20 was chosen and not /24 (16 million /48s) or even /28 (1 million /48s). I wonder if stating an initial maximum allocation is really necessary. The minimum allocation is a /32 (64 thousand /48s) according to

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2023-8 - Reduce 4.1.8 Maximum Allocation

2024-06-21 Thread Michael Greenup via ARIN-PPML
Greetings to the list! In my personal opinion, I believe the waitlist does three things: 1. Ensures those awaiting IPv4 allocations are aware the resource pools are exhausted. 2. Pushes the adoption of IPv6 as allocations are readily available. 3. Ensures there is a physical cost to those who dec