+1, I agree completely.
On 9/4/2014 εε 02:29, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 7/23/14, 7:58, ARIN wrote:
On 17 July 2014 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted "ARIN-prop-210
Simplifying Minimum Allocations and Assignments" as a Draft Policy.
Draft Policy ARIN-2014-18 is below and can be found at:
ht
Err so,
what are you actually proposing?
On 5/18/2014 ?? 10:41, Meows wrote:
Hundreds of thousands of us worked with groups like Demand Progress,
CREDO and Free Press, flooding the FCC with so many calls that they
had to literally turn their phones off.
*That still wasn't enough to stop Ch
Not seeing anything I disagree with in the PDF, so just as I supported
the original, I support this too.
On 5/6/2014 7:44 AM, Kevin Blumberg wrote:
I'm sending out a revised version of prop-208. Included is an attachment with a
redline version to assist.
I would appreciate any feedback of su
If this was actually drafted, I would too.
Doesn't seem like a bad thing.
On 5/1/2014 εεΎ 03:19, Owen DeLong wrote:
I would support.
Owen
On Apr 30, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
Friends, Colleagues,
A couple of years ago I brought up an issue I had run into where the
utilization r
Jeffrey,
While the idea is great, isn't ARIN supposed to already be implementing
this in one way?
i.e: You get one allocation, and until you can show 80% usage --
applying again generally does not get you anywhere.
Going by this, shouldn't all previous allocs ("aggregated / per
organizatio
