Re: [arin-ppml] Revised/Retitled - Draft Policy ARIN-2019-5: Validation of POCs Referenced as Abuse Contacts

2019-07-17 Thread Steve Atkins
l reach that goal. (I think that better POC validation is a decent idea, the aspect I have an issue with is "Emails sent to this address must ultimately reach a human processor who evaluates each message received.") Cheers, Steve > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > &g

Re: [arin-ppml] Revised/Retitled - Draft Policy ARIN-2019-5: Validation of POCs Referenced as Abuse Contacts

2019-07-16 Thread Steve Atkins
> On Jul 16, 2019, at 6:05 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ARIN-PPML > wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > I guess there is some misunderstanding in that part of the text. May be > “ultimately” is not doing the intended “work”. The idea is “last resort”. > > The idea is not that messages are processed

Re: [arin-ppml] Fwd: Re arin-ppml Spam replies to PPML posts

2018-04-19 Thread Steve Atkins
> On Apr 19, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Joe Provo wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:31:59PM -0300, Marilson Mapa wrote: >> You know Joe, it's weird to be accused of spammer after spending more than > [snip] > > Please note I was not accusing you of "being a spammer". Relaying > the content to the