Re: [arin-ppml] {Spam?} Re: Open Letter Regarding 650% Rate-Hike for Legacy Users

They may be referring to this : Providing a temporary IPv6 fee waiver for organizations in the 3X-Small category that desire a larger address block On Sun, Sep 19, 2021, 8:45 PM Randy Carpenter wrote: > > > - On Sep 19, 2021, at 9:52 PM, Michel Py via ARIN-PPML > arin-ppml@arin.net wrote: >

Re: [arin-ppml] {Spam?} Re: Open Letter Regarding 650% Rate-Hike for Legacy Users

7;t agree, than let's have a productive discussion. On Sun, Sep 19, 2021, 6:33 AM Martin Hannigan wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:33 AM Steve Noble wrote: > >> Since they are a non-profit, they could also cut executive salaries. As >> of 2019, John was bei

Re: [arin-ppml] {Spam?} Re: Open Letter Regarding 650% Rate-Hike for Legacy Users

Since they are a non-profit, they could also cut executive salaries. As of 2019, John was being paid over $546,000 to respond to posts on mailing lists. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/541860956 Key Employees and Officers Compensation JOHN CURRAN (CEO AND PRESIDENT) $546,0

Re: [arin-ppml] Open Letter Regarding 650% Rate-Hike for Legacy Users

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 5:17 PM Mark McDonald wrote: > > > *Confidentiality Notice:* This e-mail message, including any attachments, > is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain > confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, > disclosure or distribu

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN invoice reminders

me for and repeatedly sent nasty grams about an ASN that they refused to let me administer. A good story for valentine's day :) On Feb 14, 2016 8:40 PM, "Jimmy Hess" wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Steve Noble wrote: > > Unless like me, ARIN refuses to all

Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN invoice reminders

Unless like me, ARIN refuses to allow you access, but still bills you for the object that they claim you are not in charge of. On Feb 14, 2016 7:51 PM, "Jim Mercer" wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:15:09AM -0500, Josh Luthman wrote: > > > On 2/14/2016 7:33 AM, William Herrin wrote: > > > Today

Re: [arin-ppml] Availability of the ARIN Fee Structure Review Report

ership.) FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN Steve Noble <mailto:sno...@sonn.com> September 19, 2014 at 11:09 AM As an ASN only holder, not a member, I was denied the ability to update my ASN for years (from 2002-2011?) and ARIN refused to do anything about it. I was require

Re: [arin-ppml] Availability of the ARIN Fee Structure Review Report

As an ASN only holder, not a member, I was denied the ability to update my ASN for years (from 2002-2011?) and ARIN refused to do anything about it. I was required to pay the fees, else lose the ASN, but not allowed to update the physical address (which is what I assume registration services a

Re: [arin-ppml] Availability of the ARIN Fee Structure Review Report

As a non-member (ASN only) who has seen fees increase while being denied support, I am concerned that this fee structure looks at fees charged to organizations that are not provided membership or support with their fees. John Curran September 19, 2014 at 7:28 AM ARIN

Re: [arin-ppml] FYI -- RIPE-605 Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders

re is certainly no reason for people who would like to, to try and update the information contained within it. John Curran February 17, 2014 at 2:02 PM On Feb 17, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Steve Noble <sno...@sonn.com> wrote: Steve -      I'll be the first to adm

Re: [arin-ppml] FYI -- RIPE-605 Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders

As a holder of both legacy and non-legacy ARIN objects, I have been subject to ARIN's registry update blocks on _non-legacy_ objects that I rightfully control and use.  I spent years (6 I believe) fighting with ARIN to update the information on one of my ASNs while ARIN continued to bill me for