> I might mention also that perhaps ARIN, or someone else, may yet file a formal
> bar complaint against one of the four charged defendants, Mr. Mark Manoogian.
>
> My understanding is that Mr. Manoogian is and remains a member in good
> standing of the Massachusetts state bar, despite apparently
> It is absurd to turn away qualified candidates and it is inappropriate for
> the nominating committee to
> endeavor to deprive the membership a greater choice of candidates. In
> essence, by limiting the slate
> to the minimum number of candidates (n+1 vs. open offices), the nominating
> comm
> whois 103.60.14.185
> % [whois.apnic.net
..
> Comments? (Yes, correct information can be gained from visiting the
> appropriate RIR site, but the main database should have correct information
> as well)
>
There is no “main" database. Your whois client decided to use
whois.apnic.net <
> On May 2, 2019, at 8:31 PM, Michel Py
> wrote:
>
>> Tom Samplonius wrote :
>> Well, since transit providers universally use IRR, it is unlikely that
>> hijacks
>> even work, unless there are legacy ports where IRR was not implemented.
>
> Oh wow bi
reads. MANRS is the best way to address hijacking,
since it prevents hijacking from even happening (along with other bad things
like spoofing).
--
Tom Samplonius
VP of Technology
Urban Communications Inc.
tsamplon...@ubn.ca
___
ARIN-PPML
You ar
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Paul wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> We are getting ready to lose a /22 and /23 and 2 /24's when we switch from
> microwave data center providers
> to fiber for our ISP that the data centers have been providing for us since
> the dial-up days .
> /22 and /23 are no longer
