On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:17:21 -0600
Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote:
Because the lack of multi-homing as a justification makes every IP address user a captive of their initial carrier. Do *you*
know anyone who will renumber (short of going out of business altogether)?
Yes, me
I
I must strongly oppose 2014-17
It effectively removes meaningful needs testing for large and very large
organizations.
(I know that utilization isn't the only test but it's a major part of need
testing.)
According to my admittedly hasty and crude calculations:
If you have in aggregate a /8 of
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 06:59:39 -0700
Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
Nobody is denying resources to organizations that can document need. I don’t know what your persistent failure is in this regard
or why you are finding it difficult. However, I have yet to see a case where any reasonable need
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:07:11 -0700
Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jun 10, 2014, at 13:39 , Elvis Velea el...@velea.eu wrote:
On 10/06/14 22:15, l...@mwtcorp.net wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:11:15 +
Steven Ryerse srye...@eclipse-networks.com wrote:
Get used to it because even if
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:11:15 +
Steven Ryerse srye...@eclipse-networks.com wrote:
Get used to it because even if this Community doesn’t relent and ease up on needs requirements, the marketplace will take up the
slack outside of ARIN - and a 2nd (or more) defacto marketplace will be created.
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:07:21 +
Steven Ryerse srye...@eclipse-networks.com wrote:
And your statement to me sounds like the haves trying to make it harder for the have nots, so that it is harder for the have
nots to compete with the haves. The current ARIN policies are stacked against a small
I support the Board taking action when the staff points out a possible policy
problem.
In particular when public discussion of that problem could result in possible
harm during
the interim.
Suspending the policy to give the community time to review and possibly modify
that policy seems
Opposed as worded.
a. As mentioned by others, too vaguely and broadly worded.
i) What kind of proof would be meaningful?
ii) What constitutes legal presence.
iii) majority of their technical infrastructure and customers
In a virtualized infrastructure environment this
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 22:05:12 -0400
Hi Mike,
It feels like we have been here before,
Mike Burns m...@nationwideinc.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
I understand that there is a danger of overpurchasing (by whomever's
definition) that comes from the removal of a needs test for transfers.
In most cases
