I support the policy in that it helps companies in the region and I do
not see any harm to any entities in the region. The problem David
Huberman is trying to solve is that there are IP's being used out of
region, and we all know out of region use has lots of geo-location
issues, and for some compa
Martin:
I think making transfers of already allocated IP's easier, makes the
free pool last longer. This decelerates, not accelerates, exhaustion.
The impact will probably be slight because the buyers, the transferors,
are the medium to little guys, not David's 11 who are getting the vast
majo
I would like to address Mr. Herrin's questions below.
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:39:03 -0400
From: William Herrin
To: John Springer
Cc: "arin-ppml@arin.net"
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-204 Removing Needs Test from Small
IPv4 Transfers (fwd)
Message-ID:
Content-Type:
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:44:04 -0400
From: Martin Hannigan
To: John Springer
Cc: "arin-ppml@arin.net"
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-204 Removing Needs Test from Small
IPv4 Transfers (fwd)
Message-ID:
Support.
I have been discussing the topic of reducing need with Andrew Dul and
Owen DeLong at and since ARIN33 in Chicago. I too had reached the
conclusion that the right approach was for reduction of needs
justification for /16 and smaller, so I am very pleased to support this
proposal.
Small
Hello Andrew and Derek,
I attended ARIN33 and met with Andrew Dul and three other members of the
AC to discuss the need for IPv4 numbers for new entrants following ARIN
runout. As a result of this issue, we have collaborated to create a
draft policy
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/ARIN_pr
--
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 19:41:04 -0700
From: Jay Martin
To: david.huber...@microsoft.com
Cc: "arin-ppml@arin.net"
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 106, Issue 8
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi David,
Why do you think