and offer a fall-back to 2-byte"
>
> and if that is correct, I see no need to change this policy.
>
>
>
> -Leif
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On
> Behalf Of Jason Schiller
> Sent: Friday, Ap
-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf
Of Jason Schiller
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 12:21 PM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: [arin-ppml] 2-byte and 4-byte ASNs
I wanted to summarize what I heard at the open mic and give the wider community
a chance to comment.
Questions:
1. Is it in the best inter
Wouldn't these routing policies just need to be rewritten/modernized to
use extended communities instead of the old 32-bit communities? 64-bits
of ext-community ought to be enough for community-type, a 32-bit ASN, and
some policy instruction. Whether any routers support this, and in a
user-fr
On 4/18/2014 4:32 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Jason Schiller wrote:
>> The ARIN community continues to suggest there is no hardware reason that
>> would prevent support of 4-byte ASNs. The community desires that we use up
>> the 2-byte ASNs and continue to send
This was brought up at the open mic, and people just shrugged.
I agree that this does not sound like a solution, but at the same
time it did not move the community to reconsider their direction.
__Jason
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:32 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:21 PM,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Jason Schiller wrote:
> The ARIN community continues to suggest there is no hardware reason that
> would prevent support of 4-byte ASNs. The community desires that we use up
> the 2-byte ASNs and continue to send a message that code upgrades to support
> 4-byte AS
I wanted to summarize what I heard at the open mic and give the wider
community a chance to comment.
Questions:
1. Is it in the best interest of the Internet for ARIN to give out 2-byte
ASNs by default?
Should we use up the 2-byte ASNs, or try to conserve them for those who
need them?
2. Should
