Hi Michael,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Michael Peddemors
wrote:
> On 14-04-30 05:11 PM, David Conrad wrote:
>
>
> I recognize, any empowerment of ARIN for enforcement is a divisive topic,
> and has been for some time, but it doesn't mean we shouldn't look for a
> solution.
http://www.a
On 14-04-30 05:11 PM, David Conrad wrote:
ARIN also exists to maintain an accurate registry. This reason becomes
significantly more important both as the free pool exhausts and afterwards.
It is this area I would like to see some new changes, it is impossible
to accomplish this, if there is n
[apologies if duplicate -- mail client issues :(]
Hi,
On Apr 30, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Steven Ryerse wrote:
> Amen! ARIN's raison d'être is to allocate resources.
That is part of ARIN's reason to exist, one that becomes significantly less
relevant as the free pool exhausts.
ARIN also exists to
Hi,
On Apr 30, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Steven Ryerse wrote:
> Amen! ARIN's raison d'être is to allocate resources.
That is part of ARIN's reason to exist, one that becomes significantly less
relevant as the free pool exhausts.
ARIN also exists to maintain an accurate registry. This reason becomes
arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf
Of sandrabr...@ipv4marketgroup.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 4:56 PM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-204 Removing Needs Test from Small
IPv4Transfers (Sandra Brown)
Support.
I have been disc
