Re: [fedora-arm] Regenerating the cross stuff

2010-08-03 Thread Andy Green
On 08/03/10 11:20, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> _thumb1_case_sqi.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, no machine, >> version 1 (SYSV), not stripped > I'm not sure either, but I would e.g. try capturing the output of the > build process somewhere to make sure that, say, _thumb1_ca

Re: [fedora-arm] Regenerating the cross stuff

2010-08-03 Thread Andy Green
On 08/03/10 11:44, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> Unfortunately there's no simple way of working around that by glueing >> that option into the defaults I could find. > > That seems like a bad idea in any case -- then people would start > inadvertently linking against x86 object fil

Re: [fedora-arm] Regenerating the cross stuff

2010-08-03 Thread Andy Green
On 08/03/10 11:50, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> Hum if I go down into the rpmbuild/BUILD where it was made, I can see >> the original .o and it's fine >> >> [agr...@otae libgcc]$ armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi-objdump -f >> _thumb1_case_sqi.o >> >> _thumb1_case_sqi.o: file form

Re: [fedora-arm] Regenerating the cross stuff

2010-08-03 Thread Andy Green
On 08/03/10 12:02, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> The original is 1560 the extracted is only 686, it just because it's >> stripped though > > And stripping it by hand doesn't set the machine type to None? > > Can you re-try the whole build and see if it screws up again (or did > you