Re: [fedora-arm] OpenOffice RPMs

2010-12-29 Thread omalleys
It doesn't look like there is. I'm not saying you are wrong or it wont work to use the RHEL6b2 version, but if I was going to build them from scratch, I would probably use the f12 src. OO has a lot of dependencies. To get around the OOM issue, just add a swap file. Here is a quick how-to

Re: [fedora-arm] OpenOffice RPMs

2010-12-29 Thread Gordan Bobic
omall...@msu.edu wrote: It doesn't look like there is. I'm not saying you are wrong or it wont work to use the RHEL6b2 version, but if I was going to build them from scratch, I would probably use the f12 src. OO has a lot of dependencies. I already resolved the dependencies. F12 was

Re: [fedora-arm] OpenOffice RPMs

2010-12-29 Thread omalleys
Quoting Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net: Speaking of dependencies - there is a package build circular dependency. Not sure if this should be reported as a bug: openssl needs krb5-devel to build krb5 needs openssl-devel to build I'm pretty sure that can't be right since one has to be built

Re: [fedora-arm] OpenOffice RPMs

2010-12-29 Thread Gordan Bobic
omall...@msu.edu wrote: Quoting Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net: Speaking of dependencies - there is a package build circular dependency. Not sure if this should be reported as a bug: openssl needs krb5-devel to build krb5 needs openssl-devel to build I'm pretty sure that can't be right

Re: [fedora-arm] OpenOffice RPMs

2010-12-29 Thread Dan Horák
Gordan Bobic píše v St 29. 12. 2010 v 15:54 +: omall...@msu.edu wrote: It doesn't look like there is. I'm not saying you are wrong or it wont work to use the RHEL6b2 version, but if I was going to build them from scratch, I would probably use the f12 src. OO has a lot of

Re: [fedora-arm] OpenOffice RPMs

2010-12-29 Thread omalleys
Quoting Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net: omall...@msu.edu wrote: Quoting Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net: Speaking of dependencies - there is a package build circular dependency. Not sure if this should be reported as a bug: openssl needs krb5-devel to build krb5 needs openssl-devel to build

Re: [fedora-arm] OpenOffice RPMs

2010-12-29 Thread Gordan Bobic
1st attempt: OOM-ed with only 512MB of RAM (I wanted to avoid swapping onto SD, it's painful enough without the extra disk I/O it causes). 2nd attempt: Failed because the build process used up all 8GB of space on the SD card and died. Going through the 3rd attempt now. Let's hope the 16GB

Re: [fedora-arm] OpenOffice RPMs

2010-12-29 Thread Gordan Bobic
On 12/29/2010 06:47 PM, omall...@msu.edu wrote: Speaking of dependencies - there is a package build circular dependency. Not sure if this should be reported as a bug: openssl needs krb5-devel to build krb5 needs openssl-devel to build I'm pretty sure that can't be right since one has to be

Re: [fedora-arm] OpenOffice RPMs

2010-12-29 Thread Rich Mattes
On 12/29/2010 03:50 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: On 12/29/2010 06:47 PM, omall...@msu.edu wrote: The plan is to finish 13, do 14, then 15. As I believe some or most of the bugs if they are getting pushed upstream should be worked out.? The point I was making was that by the time we report bugs to

Re: [fedora-arm] OpenOffice RPMs

2010-12-29 Thread Gordan Bobic
On 12/29/2010 10:39 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: The plan is to finish 13, do 14, then 15. As I believe some or most of the bugs if they are getting pushed upstream should be worked out.? The point I was making was that by the time we report bugs to the mainline Fedora, the version of Fedora we are

Re: [fedora-arm] OpenOffice RPMs

2010-12-29 Thread Gordan Bobic
On 12/29/2010 10:39 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: The plan is to finish 13, do 14, then 15. As I believe some or most of the bugs if they are getting pushed upstream should be worked out.? The point I was making was that by the time we report bugs to the mainline Fedora, the version of Fedora we are