[fedora-arm] Missing fake-kernel-provides package

2011-03-26 Thread Dmitry N. Mikushin
Hi, Thanks for you great work, Fedora arm rootfs alpha worked well on toshiba ac100, then I was able to change repo and receive updates from latest beta 2. One issue I've seen is the following: http://hongkong/yum/base/12/arm/fake-kernel-provides-1.0.0-0.fc12.armv5tel.rpm: [Errno 14] PYCURL

Re: [fedora-arm] Missing fake-kernel-provides package

2011-03-26 Thread Niels de Vos
Hi Dmitry, On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Dmitry N. Mikushin maemar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for you great work, Fedora arm rootfs alpha worked well on toshiba ac100, then I was able to change repo and receive updates from latest beta 2. One issue I've seen is the following:

Re: [fedora-arm] Missing fake-kernel-provides package

2011-03-26 Thread Dmitry N. Mikushin
Hi Niels, Thanks for reply, I checked sqlite repo file on server, and it seems to contain broken URLs already, could someone please fix them? [marcusmae@fedora-arm Devel]$ wget http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/repos/dist-f13-build/latest/armv5tel/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2 --2011-03-26

Re: [fedora-arm] Are there interested parties for a xorg-x11-drv-omapfb package?

2011-03-26 Thread Matthew Wilson
On 26 March 2011 00:12, Niels de Vos de...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I came across an X.org driver for OMAP [0] and as packaged [1] this driver to prepare for my own testing. Building works fine, but I have no possibility to test this driver at the moment as I do not have a monitor to connect

Re: [fedora-arm] Are there interested parties for a xorg-x11-drv-omapfb package?

2011-03-26 Thread Niels de Vos
Hi Matthew, On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Matthew Wilson mj.wilson...@googlemail.com wrote: On 26 March 2011 00:12, Niels de Vos de...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I came across an X.org driver for OMAP [0] and as packaged [1] this driver to prepare for my own testing. Building works fine, but

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 13 ARM Beta2

2011-03-26 Thread Gordan Bobic
On 03/26/2011 09:10 PM, Matthew Wilson wrote: 2. Armv7 / VFP / NEON support to squeeze a bit more performance out (where appropriate to the h/w). I suspect you'll find that NEON won't make a noticeable difference, at least not until: 1) GCC can do worthwhile vectorization - I've yet to try