Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the
official rPi builds but that doesn't mean I'm not interested to know
whether we should put testing effort into Kirkwood for F18.
My thought is
On 10/05/2012 07:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> For Fedora 18 with 3.7 it should (whether it works out in time or we
>> start with F-19 and roll it back) mean we can support more devices
>> with a couple of less kernels. The mvebu platform is th
On 10/06/2012 05:47 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 10/05/2012 07:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> For Fedora 18 with 3.7 it should (whether it works out in time or we
>>> start with F-19 and roll it back) mean we can support more devices
>>> with a
On 10/06/2012 10:43 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the
official rPi builds but that doesn't mean I'm not interested to know
whether we should put testing
Hi Gordan,
On 10/06/2012 05:58 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> On 10/06/2012 10:43 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
>> it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the
>> official rPi builds but that
Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away.
Just to get a rough gauge of interest, perhaps we should look at the
download stats for the F17 images. That won't tell us the
number of actual 'users', but will at least give
On 10/06/2012 11:07 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Gordan,
On 10/06/2012 05:58 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 10/06/2012 10:43 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in th
> I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
> it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the
> official rPi builds but that doesn't mean I'm not interested to know
> whether we should put testing effort into Kirkwood for F18.
>
I'm using Kirk
Sat Oct 6 09:05:01 EDT 2012
f17-updates : arm vs PA
Same |Newer |Older |Local | Remote |
Missing |
--
2338 |2 | 103 |0 |
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
> it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the
> official rPi builds but that doesn't mean I'm not interested to know
> whether we
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> On 10/06/2012 10:43 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
>> it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the
>> official rPi builds but that
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi Gordan,
>
> On 10/06/2012 05:58 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>> On 10/06/2012 10:43 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
>>> it went away. For now, we won't kill off A
>> That /may/ be true. Maybe. I don't know that for sure. They certainly
>> were popular amongst a certain crowd. I would say the most popular board
>> these days is likely the rPi, followed by some of the new v7 devices,
>> especially the cheaper rPi-inspired AllWinner based stuff, which we
>> pro
> I'm using Kirkwood, with a couple of Dreamplugs. I've been working to get
> F17 and/or F18 to work on it (it turns out the Dreamplug doesn't have NAND
> and the orion_nand kernel module was hanging).
Works if you blacklist the module.
>> My thought is that the latest plugs are moving to ARMv7,
> We're planning on a 3.7 update in F18. The thing is that this is likely
> to be a disruptive upgrade as certain platforms (even without a unified
> kernel) will need to have a working device tree. Hence, the moment there
> is an -rc1 to poke at, we'll make sure this is lined up.
We will when mai
On 10/06/2012 09:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
>> I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
>> it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the
>> official rPi builds but that doesn't mean I'
On 06/10/2012 15:02, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 10/06/2012 10:43 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if
it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the
On 06/10/2012 15:11, Peter Robinson wrote:
That /may/ be true. Maybe. I don't know that for sure. They certainly
were popular amongst a certain crowd. I would say the most popular board
these days is likely the rPi, followed by some of the new v7 devices,
especially the cheaper rPi-inspired AllWi
On 10/06/2012 06:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Of course none of this is set in stone, it's a discussion and just me
putting my ideas into words.
FWIW, I likewise think we should shoot for promotion of armv7hl to
primary, leaving armv5 (or armv6) secondary. Numerous packages with
atomics issu
On 10/06/2012 07:19 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
We're planning on a 3.7 update in F18. The thing is that this is likely
to be a disruptive upgrade as certain platforms (even without a unified
kernel) will need to have a working device tree. Hence, the moment there
is an -rc1 to poke at, we'll make
On 10/06/2012 03:57 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 10/06/2012 07:19 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> We're planning on a 3.7 update in F18. The thing is that this is likely
>>> to be a disruptive upgrade as certain platforms (even without a unified
>>> kernel) will need to have a working device tree.
21 matches
Mail list logo
