Re: [fedora-arm] cloud images for arm?

2012-10-09 Thread Jon
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: >> Hey everyone. We are looking at putting ready-to-run cloud images of fedora >> on the normal mirrors, next to the install media ISOs, in both raw disk and >> qcow formats. >> >> How

Re: [fedora-arm] cloud images for arm?

2012-10-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Hey everyone. We are looking at putting ready-to-run cloud images of fedora > on the normal mirrors, next to the install media ISOs, in both raw disk and > qcow formats. > > How valuable at this point would it be to have ARM images as well?

Re: [fedora-arm] cloud images for arm?

2012-10-09 Thread Matthew Galgoci
> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:46:37 -0400 > From: Matthew Miller > To: arm@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: [fedora-arm] cloud images for arm? > > Hey everyone. We are looking at putting ready-to-run cloud images of fedora > on the normal mirrors, next to the install media ISOs, in both raw disk an

[fedora-arm] cloud images for arm?

2012-10-09 Thread Matthew Miller
Hey everyone. We are looking at putting ready-to-run cloud images of fedora on the normal mirrors, next to the install media ISOs, in both raw disk and qcow formats. How valuable at this point would it be to have ARM images as well? -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ _

Re: [fedora-arm] Who's using Kirkwood?

2012-10-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: > On 10/09/2012 03:48 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > >>> The x86 port still supports a Pentium, I don't see any reason to drop >>> support for kirkwood. Is it really that much extra effort? >> >> >> It is surprisingly quite a lot of effort. >> >> F

Re: [fedora-arm] Who's using Kirkwood?

2012-10-09 Thread Gordan Bobic
On 10/09/2012 03:48 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: The x86 port still supports a Pentium, I don't see any reason to drop support for kirkwood. Is it really that much extra effort? It is surprisingly quite a lot of effort. Fedora no longer supports Pentium actually. It was dropped some time ago (a

Re: [fedora-arm] Who's using Kirkwood?

2012-10-09 Thread Scott Sullivan
On 10/09/2012 10:36 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: I know that RPi looks interesting, but they are still very hard to acquire. (Limit 1, then wait a few months??) That Limit went away in July and it's now down semi-normal lead times instead of months. http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/1588 -- S

Re: [fedora-arm] Who's using Kirkwood?

2012-10-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: > Jon, > > Jon Masters writes: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if >> it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the >> official rPi builds but that doesn't mean I

Re: [fedora-arm] Who's using Kirkwood?

2012-10-09 Thread Derek Atkins
Jon, Jon Masters writes: > Hi Folks, > > I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if > it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the > official rPi builds but that doesn't mean I'm not interested to know > whether we should put testing effort

[fedora-arm] Daily Koji Compare Stats

2012-10-09 Thread jon . chiappetta
Tue Oct 9 09:05:01 EDT 2012 f17-updates : arm vs PA Same |Newer |Older |Local | Remote | Missing | -- 2407 |2 | 62 |0 |

Re: [fedora-arm] F17 3.6 kernel rebase

2012-10-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > I've commited the 3.6.x rebase to the F17 branch in Fedora git. The ARM > configs and patches definitely need a looking over. I haven't kicked > off a build yet so that ARM can get adjusted for the rebase. Please > look it over and let me know

[fedora-arm] F17 3.6 kernel rebase

2012-10-09 Thread Josh Boyer
I've commited the 3.6.x rebase to the F17 branch in Fedora git. The ARM configs and patches definitely need a looking over. I haven't kicked off a build yet so that ARM can get adjusted for the rebase. Please look it over and let me know when you have things squared away. I'd like to get a buil

Re: [fedora-arm] Who's using Kirkwood?

2012-10-09 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Tue, 9 Oct 2012 08:54:26 +0100 Peter Robinson escribió: > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Till Maas > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:53:45PM -0400, Scott Sullivan wrote: > >> On 10/08/2012 02:35 PM, Till Maas wrote: > >> >Hi, > >> > > >> >

[fedora-arm] Package raspi-splash broken in rasp-pi repository

2012-10-09 Thread Sergio Pascual
Hi, I'm not sure this is the place to report. Anyway, when updating my raspberry via yum, I get unresolved dependencies Error: Package: raspi-splash-1.0-12.rpfr17.armv5tel (@rasp-pi) Requires: libvcos.so Removing: raspberrypi-vc-libs-20120813gitcb9513f-2.rpfr17.armv5tel (@ras

Re: [fedora-arm] Who's using Kirkwood?

2012-10-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:53:45PM -0400, Scott Sullivan wrote: >> On 10/08/2012 02:35 PM, Till Maas wrote: >> >Hi, >> > >> >On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 05:43:33AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: >> > >> >>I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and