You might want to get some comments from Michael Hope on these numbers. The
other using Thumb 2, right?
Dave
On Dec 8, 2012 8:39 PM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
If you could run a few benchmarks between the v6 and v5 spins we'd all be
Compose started at Sun Dec 9 11:10:36 UTC 2012
Broken deps for arm
--
[GMT-coastlines]
GMT-coastlines-2.2.0-3.fc18.noarch requires GMT-common
[TeXamator]
TeXamator-1.7.5-1.fc18.noarch requires dvipng
[aeolus-conductor]
Sun Dec 9 09:05:01 EST 2012
f17-updates : arm vs PA
Same |Newer |Older |Local | Remote |
Missing |
--
2651 |0 | 318 |1
I am not sure how much difference it makes but I have noticed that the
kernel used by the v6 image is still armv5tel (everything else is armv6hl)
so there might be a bit more performance gain possible.
Michael Young
___
arm mailing list
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 5:53 PM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
I am not sure how much difference it makes but I have noticed that the
kernel used by the v6 image is still armv5tel (everything else is armv6hl)
so there might be a bit more performance gain possible.
The kernel makes no
On 12/08/2012 08:38 PM, M A Young wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
If you could run a few benchmarks between the v6 and v5 spins we'd all
be *very* interested to know the difference in performance. Even
simple stuff like time to bzip2 a cached file would be informative.
Here
