OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160708.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160709.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 54
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 11.19 KiB
Size of dropped packages
>> >> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 10:49:57AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> >> > If we can't build edk2 x86_64 bios blob on aarch64, and can't import
>> >> > the previously built noarch packages, then seems to say the only
>> >> > option left is to split the edk2 package into two source packages.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 11:03:57AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 10:49:57AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> > If we can't build edk2 x86_64 bios blob on aarch64, and can't import
>> > the previously buil
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 10:49:57AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> If we can't build edk2 x86_64 bios blob on aarch64, and can't import
> the previously built noarch packages, then seems to say the only
> option left is to split the edk2 package into two source packages.
> One that exclusively b
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 10:34:26AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 10:11:09AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> >>
>> >> [Hi Peter, might be e
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 10:11:09AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> [Hi Peter, might be easier to discuss this with everyone on the
>> mailing list rather than in fragmentary IRC conversations.]
>>
>> At the moment anything that de
