On 11/04/2015 02:11 PM, Clive Messer wrote:
> I do not understand the concept of a community based distribution being
> released, only officially supporting big $, business class,
> enterprise solutions, rather than the consumer level boards which are
> already available.
There's quite a
On 11/04/2015 02:47 PM, Clive Messer wrote:
> Maybe it is time, at least for ARM platform, to look at "softening" the
> "has to be upstream first" policy. This is hurting Fedora to the point
> of making it irrelevant on ARM. You either are supporting the popular
> consumer hardware that people are
On 04/07/2015 12:08 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I am using openjdk 1.8.0, but in some cases I got core dump, I highly
suspect it’s due to java’s version. Thus I want to try lower version
openjdk. Who can tell me if 1.7.x works well with aarch64? If so where can I
get it? Thanks a lot!
No we
On 10/06/14 19:28, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Fedora is supposed to provide a consistent experience across primary
architectures. Having a subset of our packages fail to build on ARM
means that's not true, and the current state of affairs clearly violates
point 8 of the architecture promotion
On 09/18/2013 09:04 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
and reduce debuginfo size by changing from -g (equals to -g2) to
-g1,
Why would anyone do that? It'll spoil the debug experience.
Andrew.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 06/17/2013 10:03 AM, Basanta Shrestha wrote:
I am looking for a firefox tarball and not a rpm. We have one activity that
requires the firefox folder ( folder we get when extracting
firefox.x.x.tar.gz) to be placed somewhere within that activity folder
structures. Installing rpm will
What it says. I'm doing builds over NFS, which used to work just fine.
But I am seeing occasional huge delays and in general very slow performance.
There was a bug in the past where the Ethernet powered down, and another
where the CPU went into sleep mode to often and took too long to come out
On 02/20/2013 01:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
What it says. I'm doing builds over NFS, which used to work just fine.
But I am seeing occasional huge delays and in general very slow performance.
There was a bug in the past
On 02/20/2013 01:53 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/20/2013 01:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
What it says. I'm doing builds over NFS, which used to work
On 02/19/2013 04:38 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
We've a few dependency issues building this on F19 just now, but it will
build for v7 against 2.2.3 on F18 as well locally. If someone with more
knowledge of mongo would like to take a poke/test, cool. I have done a
literal port of the x86_64
On 02/19/2013 04:57 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
On 02/19/2013 11:38 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 02/19/2013 04:38 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
We've a few dependency issues building this on F19 just now, but it will
build for v7 against 2.2.3 on F18 as well locally. If someone with more
knowledge of mongo
On 01/15/2013 09:41 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I'll be all over the place while there so have no real plans for where
and what I'll be doing. It'll be a combination of ARM, Fedora stuff,
virtualisation/cloud and I suspect a whole lot of hall way discussion.
So if there's people going to be
On 01/09/2013 01:02 PM, Julian Leyh wrote:
I would be very interested in getting gnat working on Fedora
ARM. Currently, the gcc.spec only enables it for x86, x86_64, ia64, ppc,
ppc64, and alpha.
Is anybody working on enabling it for ARM? If so, I would be willing to
help. I have a
On 12/21/2012 12:35 AM, Al Stone wrote:
On 12/20/2012 12:58 PM, David A. Marlin wrote:
On 12/20/2012 12:43 PM, Scott Sullivan wrote:
On 12/20/2012 01:32 PM, Sean Omalley wrote:
You could do a block diagram of a V8 chip, and say I want a v8. :)
[...]
On 12/20/2012 01:20 PM, Chris Tyler
$ emacs
emacs: symbol lookup error: /lib/libEGL.so.1: undefined symbol:
wl_registry_interface
This seems to be due to Wayland being pulled in by something. I've
attached the ld.so trace.
Andrew.
6690:
6690: file=libgtk-3.so.0 [0]; needed by emacs [0]
6690:
On 09/11/2012 06:14 PM, Jon Chiappetta wrote:
This is the full log file with the build error at the end of it. If there are
other files from the build root that could help debug this please let me know
and I can host/post them.
Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
On 09/11/2012 04:58 PM, Jon Chiappetta wrote:
I've been asking in channel for some help on this but I think I'm kind of
stuck here and I've been told that this mailing list potentially reaches a
lot more people. I've been trying to build gcc for armv6hl which is a new
arch for it and of
On 08/08/2012 06:15 AM, Luke Macken wrote:
Does anyone have any ideas for potential Fedora ARM related projects
that we could throw one or more students at for a 10-week block?
Yes. The OpenJDK Java port doesn't have a JIT compiler that works on
Raspberry Pi. The OpenJDK JIT generates Thumb2
On 05/31/2012 01:50 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
There's one addition I would like to see to the final release criteria:
Updated linker path in gcc and glibc.
Why is that important? We'll drop a compat symlink in anyway,
and no-one should notice the change.
Andrew.
On 05/01/2012 05:14 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 04/28/2012 08:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I still can't get any Fedora 17 kernel (soft or hard FP) to boot on
qemu-system-arm, on either F17/x86_64 or F17/arm host.
On x86-64 it just consumes 100% of CPU, no console, no video, never
On 04/24/2012 07:11 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/24/2012 05:27 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
Times in various timezones:
PDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
CST: 10pm
According to Google calendar, that's 10pm BST
On 04/23/2012 09:31 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 04/23/2012 06:36 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
I'm running the Ubuntun 2.6.38 Tegra2 kernel (because of their fbdev
support) on top of Fedora 17 armv5el on an Toshiba AC100 Laptop. The
rsyslog package crashed
On 04/24/2012 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 04/23/2012 09:31 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 04/23/2012 06:36 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
I'm running the Ubuntun 2.6.38 Tegra2 kernel (because of their fbdev
On 04/24/2012 04:49 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 04/24/2012 12:39 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 04/23/2012 09:31 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 04/23/2012 06:36 PM, Thomas
On 04/24/2012 05:27 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
Times in various timezones:
PDT: 2pm
CDT: 3pm
EDT: 4pm
UTC: 8pm
BST: 9pm
CST: 10pm
According to Google calendar, that's 10pm BST.
Andrew.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 04/24/2012 05:40 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 04/24/2012 05:18 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
I wasn't going to reply yet just due to lack of time and because Nico
covered the kernel helper stuff so well in his earlier posts. But just
to add, these kernel
On 04/23/2012 02:16 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
As we get closer to having 100% package coverage in F17-ARM we're
running into harder build failures due to the limitations of the chips
we're building for. The problem I've noticed on many of the recent
failures is due to the lack of atomic
On 04/23/2012 04:06 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
the main problem no only in ARM land is that many software developers
like to develop their own atomic ops implementations in their project
instead of using some standard one eg. from GCC :-( I fight with this
problem again and again on s390 ...
On 04/23/2012 06:36 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 22.04.2012, 22:34 -0400 schrieb Chris Tyler:
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 18:16 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
As we get closer to having 100% package coverage in F17-ARM we're
running into harder build failures due to the limitations of the
On 04/15/2012 07:01 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:42:41AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
Does anyone here know the difference between Thumb2 and Thumb? I could
extract it from the ISA docs, but I wondered if there was a summary
somewhere.
At the core: Thumb is all 16-bit
Does anyone here know the difference between Thumb2 and Thumb? I could
extract it from the ISA docs, but I wondered if there was a summary
somewhere.
Thanks,
Andrew.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 02/29/2012 01:07 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Fedora at least runs just fine with 256Mb of RAM. I have a few devices
with such spec that will happy run a UX on them, the XO-1 is one
example.
Define runs just fine, please. Default desktop environment with some
commonly used applications like
On 01/26/2012 04:42 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/26/2012 04:32 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Have these changes gone into mainline rawhide as yet?
No.
If not is there a time frame to get the changes in? I'm in the
process
On 02/02/2012 09:56 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Thanks for the update. Looking at the version
1.6.0.0-0.arm1.68.1.11.fc15 it's an ARM specific build, are the
fixes in mainline and rawhide?
Yes.
Andrew.
___
arm mailing list
Fixed a couple of crasher bugs.
New RPMs at http://aph.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/armv7hl/
Andrew.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
On 01/26/2012 04:33 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Oh and can you put the src.rpms there as well?
Already there, surely.
Andrew.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
On 12/30/2011 10:28 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/08/2011 04:40 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Are all the fixes needed for java in rawhide now?
No. I'm looking at branching next week in order to make a
new release, which
On 12/08/2011 04:40 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Are all the fixes needed for java in rawhide now?
No. I'm looking at branching next week in order to make a
new release, which will be icedtea 1.11. That'll go in the
RPM, which will go in rawhide.
Andrew.
On 11/29/2011 02:46 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 11/29/2011 02:42 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 11/29/2011 02:01 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
One other thing - one of the manifestations of this bug appears to be
random memory corruption (strange, I know - unless I am dealing with two
totally unrelated
On 11/21/2011 09:35 AM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
So, the only thing I did not manage to do was to bootstrap with gcj; it
appears only gij is problematic, usually it fails early with an
Index out of bounds exception. I should be missing some gcc patch...
Probably, yes. If you
On 11/15/2011 04:37 PM, David Gates wrote:
Hello fedora arm list.
We are looking for help and ideas to open development of our network
block device driver.
We think it is the perfect match for small arm based systems to increase
storage and we would also like to integrate it into a
On 11/15/2011 05:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
My advice: try to make sure that the licence you choose is one that
is used by many other projects. Please make sure that it is GPL v3
compatible.
If this is kernel code, you don't really
On 11/15/2011 05:25 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
We are currently slightly stuck in getting GNU Java to work properly on our
ARM (hf) builds. Something breaks in the unrolling of exceptions.
IIUC Fedora already managed to get Java running and I don't want to waste
too much time in duplicated
Test F15 OpenJDK packages are at http://aph.fedorapeople.org.
These are very like the packages we intend to release, although
they haven't been through testing yet.
Comments welcome.
Andrew.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 10/20/2011 08:14 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
ttor 2011-10-20 klockan 17:30 +0100 skrev Peter Robinson:
How many of these have been submitted upstream?
I suspect very few, there's only about 100 odd there so it shouldn't
take long to get them upstreamed.
java-1.5.0-gcj
On 09/23/2011 04:36 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
Hey aph,
Copying Fedora ARM public mailing list. See also #fedora-arm on Freenode
if you'd like to swing by and talk about Java packages :)
I need some advice. We're 13 packages shy of a minimal package set for
F15 (if we exclude things like
I have updated all of my packages, and /usr/lib/libffi.so.6 is gone.
Sorry for the noise.
Everything is at:
http://aph.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/armv7hl/
Andrew.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
The libffi package update that I did had a nasty side-effect: it bumped
the soname to libffi.so.6. This is an incompatible change to Fedora 15,
and after some negotiation with the libffi maintainer I'm building a
new RPM that reverts the change back to libffi.so.5. I'm also rebuilding
OpenJDK
On 08/16/2011 03:25 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
It would appear that since I replaced libgcc_s.so with a linker script,
there are a couple of changes in the build of glibc:
* -fno-stack-protector is no longer required in BuildFlags for the
build to succeed
* The following process goes
On 08/10/2011 02:43 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 10:24:03 +0100, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 08/05/2011 09:07 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Thanks for pointing out, it does look like the same bug. So what's
the
fix/workaround?
On 08/05/2011 08:59 PM, Niels de Vos
On 08/15/2011 02:49 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:59:56 +0100, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 08/15/2011 11:46 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:30:36 +0100, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 08/15/2011 11:11 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On Mon
On 08/15/2011 04:08 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:52:50 +0100, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 08/15/2011 02:49 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:59:56 +0100, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
wrote:
Is that the bug that you are saying ISN'T related
On 08/05/2011 01:56 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
It is basically just that, possibly some changes to the spec file itself as
well from memory when I looked at it. diffing against mainline will tell you
that. The fixes for F-13
On 08/03/2011 04:12 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
The libffi in the F15 buildroot is completely FUBAR: it doesn't
work with hardfp at all.
There's new RPMs at
http://aph.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/RPMS/armv7hl/libffi-*3.0.10rc9-1.fc15.armv7hl.rpm
This is cut from the development sources, so
Are at http://aph.fedorapeople.org. There's an ecj RPM too,
which we need for bootstrapping Java. I'll be bringing up
the Java dependencies over the next few days, and I can put
them all in aph.fedorapeople.org.
Andrew.
___
arm mailing list
Backtraces crash on F15 ARM, which breaks gcj and perhaps a ton
of other stuff too. I've written a patch which is at
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2011-08/msg0.html
Andrew.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
I have fixed gcc RPMs. Please let me know how to get them to you so
that you can integrate them into the tree.
Andrew.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
gcj still doesn't work because, for some reason I don't yet
understand, backtraces are broken. When backtrace is called from a
thread, it wanders off the end of the stack and segfaults. This
doesn't happen with F13.
When I find out what's broken it, I'll let you know.
To compile the example,
On 07/29/2011 01:50 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
gcj still doesn't work because, for some reason I don't yet
understand, backtraces are broken. When backtrace is called from a
thread, it wanders off the end of the stack and segfaults. This
doesn't happen with F13.
When I find out what's broken
On 06/23/2011 09:10 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 22/06/11 21:15, Peter Robinson wrote:
Have these issues been filed as bugs?
I'm going to push all of them upstream.
Are there going to be fixes committed
to mainline
On 05/16/2011 03:11 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/16/2011 03:04 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Monday, May 16, 2011 08:43:17 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/16/2011 02:41 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Monday, May 16, 2011 08:37:43 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/12/2011 04:57 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote
On 05/25/2011 11:31 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/25/2011 10:38 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Gordan Bobic [25/05/2011 11:25] :
aph:
Perhaps, but its licence seems to be broken, so it can't be used as a
general-purpose crypto library for Fedora
On 05/25/2011 12:06 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Andrew Haley wrote:
I'm not against NSS - really I'm not. But there are other considerations
to be taken into account.
1) Does NSS have any kind of support for hardware crypto offload? If so,
I haven't found any references to it (but maybe my
On 05/23/2011 04:12 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
omall...@msu.edu wrote:
My question, is how hard is this to implement the hardware support
non-openssl programs.
Not particularly hard if you're writing your own crypto implementation
anyway, but there's a lot to be said for just linking
On 05/16/2011 03:17 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/16/2011 03:04 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Monday, May 16, 2011 08:43:17 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/16/2011 02:41 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Monday, May 16, 2011 08:37:43 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/12/2011 04:57 PM
On 05/16/2011 05:30 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
I'm really stuck without debuginfo, and
Could not find debuginfo for main pkg:
java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-31.fc13.armv5tel
Is it available somewhere? It isn't at
http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/beta/f13-arm-2011-05-10/f13-arm/arm
On 01/07/2011 07:33 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 01/07/2011 06:52 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
No, it's not the same issue.
On x86 as described on your link, it's just a performance penalty if
your members are not aligned. On ARM without fixup, you read actual
garbage as described on my article
On 01/07/2011 11:13 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Guys, it is as I suspected:
Before building dietlibc (with my patches (posted to bugzilla), without
which it won't build at all):
User: 0
System: 1
Skipped:0
Half: 0
Word: 0
DWord: 1
On 01/07/2011 06:45 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 01/07/2011 05:25 PM, Andy Green wrote:
On 01/07/11 17:17, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
No, it's not the same issue.
On x86 as described on your link, it's just a performance penalty if
your members are not aligned. On ARM without
69 matches
Mail list logo
