On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 08:29 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> ffcall-1.10-13.20120424cvs.fc19
ExclusiveArch
> kernel-3.11.0-0.rc5.git2.2.fc20
> kernel-3.12.0-0.rc0.git20.1.x1.fc19
Mea culpa. I built this manually and didn't copy src.rpm to repo
so it fooled the
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 08:06 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> sdcc-3.3.0-0.fc19
lyx -e latex sdccman.lyx;
make[1]: *** [sdccman.tex] Segmentation fault
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/sdcc-3.3.0/doc'
___
On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 08:11 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> hyperv-daemons-0-0.1.20130826git.fc19
ExclusiveArch
> libbluedevil-1.9.4-1.fc19
qt problem?:
/bin/sh: line 1: 19955 Segmentation fault /usr/lib64/qt4/bin/qdbusxml2cpp
> snifflib-1.8.13-2.fc19
Re
On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 08:11 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> rubygem-cinch-2.0.9-1.fc19
Requires: jansi-native
Requires: eclipse-equinox-osgi
> usb_modeswitch-1.2.7-3.fc19
autosetup/system.tcl:204: Error:
/builddir/build/BUILD/usb-modeswitch-1.2.6/jim/autosetu
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 08:09 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> glite-jobid-api-java-1.3.6-1.fc19
Requires: eclipse-equinox-osgi
> rubygem-mixlib-shellout-1.2.0-1.fc19
Requires: jansi-native
Requires: eclipse-equinox-osgi
> xmonad-log-applet-2.1.0-3.fc19
patchi
On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 08:10 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> groonga-3.0.7-1.fc19
ExclusiveArch
> ncbi-blast+-2.2.28-1.fc19
Needs updated config.{guess,sub}
> pocl-0.8-7.fc19
configure: error: unknown/unsupported host aarch64-redhat-linux-gnu
> zarafa-7.1.5-1
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 08:10 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> tog-pegasus-2.12.1-7.fc19
This one was a problem on the builder (my fault). It is now
built and in stage4 repo.
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraprojec
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 10:01 -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 06:09 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > 在 2013-9-8 PM11:37，"Mark Salter" 写道：
> > >
> > > > joyce-2.2.6-1.fc19
> > > Link failed because of missing libdsk symbols. libd
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 08:10 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> nodejs-cli-0.4.5-1.fc19
> nodejs-commander-1.2.0-6.fc19
> nodejs-express-3.3.5-1.fc19
> nodejs-form-data-0.1.1-1.fc19
> nodejs-fresh-0.2.0-1.fc19
> nodejs-keypress-0.2.1-1.fc19
> nodejs-mime-1.2.11-1.f
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 06:09 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> 在 2013-9-8 PM11:37，"Mark Salter" 写道：
> >
> > > joyce-2.2.6-1.fc19
> > Link failed because of missing libdsk symbols. libdsk is in chroot
> > but a configure test for it failed.
>
> Should
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 08:10 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> gnotime-2.4.1-5.fc19
Needs libgda
> joyce-2.2.6-1.fc19
Link failed because of missing libdsk symbols. libdsk is in chroot
but a configure test for it failed.
> sugar-turtleart-187-1.fc19
Requires: gn
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 08:11 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> asterisk-sounds-core-1.4.24-1.fc19
? No build logs
> ovirt-node-3.0.0-6.0.fc19
Looks like it failed because repo changed at a bad time.
DEBUG util.py:264: --> selinux-policy-devel-3.12.1-73.fc19.noa
On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 08:09 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> clean-2.4-16.fc19
ExclusiveArch
> dmlite-plugins-adapter-0.6.1-1.fc19
dmlite-plugins-adapter-0.6.1/src/DpmAdapter.cpp:423:30: error: 'anyToU64' is
not a member of 'dmlite::Extensible'
reqfile.re
On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 08:10 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> glibc-2.17-11.fc19
> glibc-2.17-14.fc19
Need aarch64 patches. bz#950093
I have a patched glibc-2.17-14 building now. The patches in the bz
are backports of needed (for aarch64) things that didn't make
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 21:58 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 04.09.2013 14:08, Brendan Conoboy pisze:
> > Total current build failure count: 851 failed
> >
> > Build failures from unsatisfied dependencies: 357 failed-dep-rpms
> > See http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/data/failed-dep-
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 08:08 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> bodr-10-1.fc19
parole-0.5.2-1.fc19
Incorrect system clocks on:
amd-drachma-01-model-9
aarch64-2
> freediams-0.9.0-0.1.beta1.fc19
/usr/include/QtCore/qlist.h:759: undefined reference to
`Utils:
On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 08:09 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> glite-lbjp-common-gss-3.2.13-2.fc19
This one failed because of a %check in the changelog which caused a
problem when combined with the stage4 override of the %check macro.
I built it with a modified mo
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 08:52 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 08/30/2013 07:56 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Kyle McMartin > absolutely no sense on anything but x86.
> >
> > Which is precisely why it's x86 exclusive arch.
>
> It'll still get queued up in stag
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 13:37 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 07/23/2013 05:09 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> > Naive Top 10 dependency issues
> > 147 kdelibs4-devel
> > 123 kdelibs4-devel >= 4.10.4
>
> Is anybody working on this? It's now the largest and deepest missing
> dependency.
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 10:30 -0500, Guy Streeter wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 07:08 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> ...
> > Packages building since previous report (which might be stuck or crashed)
> ...
> > shiboken-1.1.0-3.fc19.src.rpm
>
> shiboken build stalled in /usr/bin/generatorrunner invocation, in
FYI,
I put up a wiki page with a list of packages in stage4 which still
require patches. I *think* I got them all.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/AArch64/Stage4_Patched_Packages
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 08:24 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Naive Top 10 dependency issues
> 190 ghc-Cabal-devel
> 105 qt4-devel
> 95 kdelibs4-devel
> 77 kdelibs4-devel >= 4.10.3
> 72 qt-devel
kdelibs is blocked on qt mostly, so this is really 349 pkgs
waiting on qt (which is
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 08:24 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Newly attempted builds that failed:
> armacycles-ad-0.2.8.3.2-4.fc19
Needs aarch64 config.{sub,guess} patch.
> dyninst-8.1.1-1.fc19
Needs aarch64 port or aarch64 added to ExcludeArch (s390 and arm
are excluded)
> gnome-clocks-3.8.1-1.fc1
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 09:57 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 09:00 AM, Mark Salter wrote:
> >> 611 graphviz
> > Needs php (which is currently building)
>
> This should start up a number of builds.
>
> >> 462 globus-core(x86-64) >= 8
&
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 08:10 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Naive Top 10 dependency issues
>1856 ghc-Cabal-devel
> 999 qt4-devel
> 929 kdelibs4-devel
> 728 qt-devel
> 720 kdelibs4-devel >= 4.10.3
> 624 SDL_image-devel
This failed to build because yum chose SDL-devel-1.2.15-7
> Naive Top 10 dependency issues
> 34 1:mariadb-5.5.30-1.fc19.aarch64 (stage4) perl(DBI)
> 19 doxygen
These finished building overnight. openjade also built so gtkdoc should
work now. I think we now have all of the doc-building packages.
> 18 fakeroot rpmdevtools-8.3-3.fc19.noarch
On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 20:15 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 10:36 AM, Mark Salter wrote:
> > Why isn't gcc on this list? I had been working on this, but after the
> > last failure a few days ago, I patched it and requeued it. Some other
> > builder grabb
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 08:05 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> Packages building since previous report (which might be stuck or crashed)
> atlas-3.8.4-8.fc19.src.rpm
> drgeo-1.1.0-24.fc19.src.rpm
> gdb-7.6-28.fc19.src.rpm
> mariadb-5.5.30-1.fc19.src.rpm
mariadb is churning along on one of my builder
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 18:43 -0700, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Mark Salter
> wrote:
> Next steps are a hosted repo so we can do the stage 4 builds
> with the
> script used for the hard float bootstrap:
>
>
Package building using the stage3 root has reached a point where we have
enough of the needed packages to compose a stage4 root which can build
packages using mock. I have added the start of stage 4 notes at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/AArch64/Stage4Notes#AArch64_Bootstrap
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 10:11 -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 06:37 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > I say we need the list of packages effected. then we can evaluate how
> > critical it is that we take action.
>
> Here is the initial list:
>
> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~blc/fedora
I've heads down lately building RPMs in stage3 and haven't posted any
status in a while. I updated the wiki this morning with notes on the
packages built so far:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/AArch64/Stage3Notes
I think we now have everything in the rootfs which is needed to r
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 17:33 -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> On 01/31/2013 05:15 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:24:47PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> >>
> >> Well, we now know the workaround; do the commit, then ssh into fp.o and
> >> run git update-server-info in the repo. Ugly, but
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 16:57 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
> Thanks Al & Mark!
>
> I used my fedorapeople account to clone using ssh. But it seems http
> is
> still not work, :( Anyway, there is a way for me fetch the latest
> change.
>
> The new problem is when I ran ./stage3 script it shows the follo
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 11:23 -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> On 01/29/2013 11:09 AM, Mark Salter wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 14:12 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:52:24AM -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 09:05 +0800, Chen Ba
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 14:12 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:52:24AM -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 09:05 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
> > > Thanks, Mark. I've switched to another machine which has better network
> > > connec
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 09:05 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
> Thanks, Mark. I've switched to another machine which has better network
> connection. And It finally works, :) I guess something I've checkout before
> was corrupt due to both my poor network connection and big size of the
> rootfs.
>
> BTW, s
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 11:42 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 19:38 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
> > Hi, Mark & Al
> >
> > I've tried to catch up the latest progress of armv8 bootstrap project.
> > However, it seems that there is problem when fet
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 19:38 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
> Hi, Mark & Al
>
> I've tried to catch up the latest progress of armv8 bootstrap project.
> However, it seems that there is problem when fetching the rootfs' git
> repository. The latest HEAD that I can fetch is still at 3e7ab1be, which is
> co
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 21:48 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Lets make sure we get patches into fedora packages before we get a new
> gcc in rawhide and end up with a mass rebuild.
>
The upstream gcc 3.8 release should have aarch64 support in it. So I
don't know that there will be any patches neede
This week was a step back from building stage2 packages so that effort
could be focused on some of the problems encountered. Primarily, the
issue with rpm hanging in libfreebl3 was tracked down to glibc. The
aarch64 patch we were using in the glibc package had an issue with
syscall return value han
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 11:07 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 19:05 -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 06:09 PM, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 14:02 -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > >> The redhat-rpm-config and rpm packages build,
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 19:05 -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 06:09 PM, Mark Salter wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 14:02 -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> >> The redhat-rpm-config and rpm packages build, but Mark Salter and
> >> Jon Masters will need to put their h
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 14:02 -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> The redhat-rpm-config and rpm packages build, but Mark Salter and
> Jon Masters will need to put their heads together to figure out
> what needs changing so that they'll work properly for aarch64.
I'm trying the following
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 13:31 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:29:14PM -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-12-27@19:18 -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > > In progress now are the nss and elfutils packages. Mark Slater is
> > > working on elfutils.
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 15:01 -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > diff --git a/etc/ld.so.conf b/etc/ld.so.conf
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..4d778f0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/etc/ld.so.conf
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +/lib64
> > +/usr/lib64
> >
> > The linker should look in those directories anyw
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 19:18 -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> For those following along at home...
>
> The nss-utils and nss-softokn packages now build properly for stage2.
> They needed to have 64-bit builds enabled and nss-softokn has an
> infinite loop that is fortunately only used in code needed for FI
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 08:44 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:04 -0500, Chris Tyler wrote:
> > We're ready to go the moment we have finished these tasks:
> > - the gcc/glibc issues are resolved
>
> I believe that glibc as of 2.14.90-15.1 have all the
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 14:04 -0500, Chris Tyler wrote:
> We're ready to go the moment we have finished these tasks:
> - the gcc/glibc issues are resolved
I believe that glibc as of 2.14.90-15.1 have all the patches
we need.
--Mark
___
arm mailing list
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 11:41 -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:48 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> > On 10/25/2011 04:06 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > > http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-vs-armv7hl.html
> >
> > Cool!
> >
> > What i
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 12:00 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Always provide declarations of long double math functions when !_LIBC
> >
> > appears to fix the problem glibc-arm-mathdefs.patch tries to work
> > around. It is a simple patch which easily backports to 2.14.7.
>
> Yes, the "correct" fi
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 17:48 -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 04:06 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > http://djdelorie.fedorapeople.org/armv5tel-vs-armv7hl.html
>
> Cool!
>
> What is the plan for reconciling the differences?
>
> A few packages stand out as being particularly concerning:
>
.
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:52 -0500, Jeffrey Bastian wrote:
> On 2011-09-13 10:18, Mark Salter wrote:
> > These numbers are for SD card in an mmc slot, right? I wouldn't expect
> > the patch to the USB EHCI driver to have any effect on SD card speed.
>
> Oh, you're r
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 09:49 -0500, Jeffrey Bastian wrote:
> On 2011-09-12 13:24, David Marlin wrote:
> > I'm glad you were able to find the problem. This kernel probably lacks
> > the patch to handle the persistent MAC address. It does, however, have
> > support for Flattened Device Tree, and a pat
54 matches
Mail list logo
