On 14 November 2012 06:21, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/13/2012 01:24 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
There are several serious mistakes in your assembly example.
Thanks for the feedback! Appreciated. Comments below...
|START_FUNC(opal_atomic_add_32)
| push{r4-r7}
Why r4
On 14 May 2012 16:57, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/13/2012 04:34 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
On 12 May 2012 22:12, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 01:41:43PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 05/11/2012 01:04 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Has anyone
On 12 May 2012 22:12, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 01:41:43PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 05/11/2012 01:04 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Has anyone tried to debug our Fedora/arm kernels under qemu-system-arm?
(In this case, the host is also arm, but
On 29 April 2012 01:39, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
For the record, attached is the patch to Fedora glibc. It works, and
gets us past the missing ucontext problem.
However, qemu-system-arm fails very quickly afterwards somewhere in
TCG code. I suspect that qemu cannot
2011/11/22 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org:
2011/11/21 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org:
2011/11/21 Henrik Nordström hen...@henriknordstrom.net:
mån 2011-11-21 klockan 11:23 +1300 skrev Michael Hope:
Let me know if Linaro can help. I see that Joey Ye from ARM is
working
2011/11/21 Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org:
2011/11/21 Henrik Nordström hen...@henriknordstrom.net:
mån 2011-11-21 klockan 11:23 +1300 skrev Michael Hope:
Let me know if Linaro can help. I see that Joey Ye from ARM is
working in this area as well.
Current GCC topics are
a) More
2011/11/19 Henrik Nordström hen...@henriknordstrom.net:
tor 2011-11-17 klockan 02:55 -0500 skrev Jon Masters:
* gcc - making sure the bitfields patches are in place for v5
Actually it's not quite in place for v7 even. The gcc in v7 still
generates bad code on volatile bitfield accesses.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:45 PM, David A. Marlin dmar...@redhat.com wrote:
Chris Tyler wrote:
I want a Fedora-ARM t-shirt!
Anyone else interested in getting some made up? Any ideas on design?
(One idea that crossed my mind was a medium blue shirt with Fedora ARM
on the sleeve, but maybe
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 09:54 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Right. v7 based Tegra parts will be supported by virtue of the vfpv3-d16
ABI (some newer VFPv3 parts have 16 additional optional registers not
required by the minimal
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Gordan Bobic gor...@bobich.net wrote:
Jon Masters wrote:
If you read how VFPv3 actually implements its registers, you'll see that
the extra 16 (for D32) really are totally separate anyway as far as the
ABI is concerned, so I remain unconvinced we lose a lot by
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org wrote:
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 08:23 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
*). ARM VFP3 hardware floating point (h)
*). ARM NEON Architecture
*). Thumb2 interworking
I don't think you have to anything explicit here. Thumb-2 and ARM
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Xerxes Ranby xer...@zafena.se wrote:
On 2011-04-02 00:20, Michael Hope wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:50 AM,omall...@msu.edu wrote:
Did anyone ever get llvm/clang working?
It -says- it is fast, good optimization, faster binaries, aimed at
generating
12 matches
Mail list logo
