[fedora-arm] Re: U-Boot testing request - 2023.10 series

Le mer. 23 août 2023 à 14:01, Nicolas Chauvet a écrit : > > Le sam. 19 août 2023 à 19:53, Peter Robinson a écrit : > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > The 2023.10 RC series are now landing in F-39 and rawhide. There's > > been the beginnings of a few enhancements.

[fedora-arm] Re: U-Boot testing request - 2023.10 series

Le sam. 19 août 2023 à 19:53, Peter Robinson a écrit : > > Hi Folks, > > The 2023.10 RC series are now landing in F-39 and rawhide. There's > been the beginnings of a few enhancements. ... > least be no different than the usual process but I'd like to hear any > feedback. I have an issue on

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora for Tegra / jetson nano : how good is it ?

Le ven. 12 mai 2023 à 14:31, Mario Marietto a écrit : > > The Nvidia Jetson Nano. was announced as a development system in mid-March > 2019. Only 4 years have passed. Not 8. I'm an end user,that's how I count. I > may agree that,generally . I've even requested that nvidia to better support

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora for Tegra / jetson nano : how good is it ?

Le mar. 9 mai 2023 à 00:12, Mario Marietto a écrit : > > Hello. > > I dont hide my interest in the installation of fedora on the Jetson nano. I > would like to understand what works and what not. Can I have a more modern OS > than Ubuntu 18.04 ? help me to understand. Very thanks. I have a

[fedora-arm] Re: hardlink segfaults on armv7 in F-36

Le ven. 7 avr. 2023 à 18:44, Nicolas Chauvet a écrit : > > Le mar. 4 avr. 2023 à 16:48, Dan Horák a écrit : > > > > Hi all, > > > > is anyone here still running an armv7 hw with F-36? Could you check if > > /usr/bin/hardlink -n -c -vvv . > > in some d

[fedora-arm] Re: hardlink segfaults on armv7 in F-36

Le mar. 4 avr. 2023 à 16:48, Dan Horák a écrit : > > Hi all, > > is anyone here still running an armv7 hw with F-36? Could you check if > /usr/bin/hardlink -n -c -vvv . > in some directory with some files segfaults for you? > > I know F-36 is getting EOLed soon, but there might be a toolchain

[fedora-arm] Re: Le Potato?

Le ven. 31 mars 2023 à 13:55, Peter Robinson a écrit : > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 7:03 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > Google has failed me. Can I run Fedora on a Le Potato? If so, what target > > do I use? > > > > Anything I need to do before writing the image? > > > > I plan to use eMMC if I

[fedora-arm] Rawhide nodebug kernel for armhfp

Hi, With the removal of the armhfp koji target in rawhide, the kernel-rawhide-nodebug kernel repository is missing an armhfp build. As building an armhfp kernel on copr natively is inefficient (it would use an x86_64 builder with qemu-system-arm emulation), I've setup a copr repository that will

[fedora-arm] Re: plexmediaserver app for fedora-arm on raspberry pi 4B 8 gig

Le lun. 2 août 2021 à 19:56, Donatom M a écrit : > > I have fedora-arm 34 with openbox. Where/how can I get plexmediaserver for > this system? plex-media-player (not server) is available via rpmfusion for armhfp and aarch64 (along x86_64). I'm not sure which video acceleration method is

[fedora-arm] Re: Qt with GLES

Le mar. 22 sept. 2020 à 13:23, rinigus a écrit : > > As far as I have seen, having pkgconfig(gl) in Qt devel dependencies > brings in glvnd libs in all kinds of variants clashing with libhybris. > Specific issue I will have to recheck tonight and get back to you. > > Maybe such a combination Mesa

[fedora-arm] Jetson-tk1 regulator and initramfs

HI, FYI, I've found an issue with the current kernel 5.6.x (maybe earlier) the as3722_regulator module isn't added by dracut in hostonly mode (it is added as all others regulators) I need to add this: cat >/etc/dracut.conf.d/jetson-tk1.conf

[fedora-arm] Re: Moving root fs to sata

Le ven. 7 juin 2019 à 17:24, Steven A. Falco a écrit : > > I have a wandboard quad, and I'd like to move the root filesystem to a sata > drive. I have the drive connected and formatted, and I copied all of "/" to > a partition on the sata drive. > > Now the question is "where do I need to

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 28 with the "grate-driver" for (older) Tegra

2018-09-12 17:13 GMT+02:00 Peter Robinson : >> In short, this FLOSS driver allows to enable video acceleration with >> vdpau on older tegra soc. > > How does this relate to the tegr-vde driver for video acceleration > that's already in the upstream kernel[1] , albeit in staging, that > supports

[fedora-arm] Fedora 28 with the "grate-driver" for (older) Tegra

Hi, FYI I've recently compiled a set of packages (1) from the grate-driver project (2). In short, this FLOSS driver allows to enable video acceleration with vdpau on older tegra soc. There is also a very basic mesa driver, but it only advertise opengl 1.4 and gles 2.0 (probably not really

[fedora-arm] Re: Help testing suspend on arm

2018-09-04 20:05 GMT+02:00 Robert Moskowitz : > Nicolas, > > I finally have an Xfce desktop. So I decided to try suspend to ram. > > It did something, but then stopped. Monitor is still on, in character mode. > And I realized, WHAT do I do to get the system to resume? What do I have on > this

[fedora-arm] Re: Help testing suspend on arm

2018-08-29 14:24 GMT+02:00 Peter Robinson : > Hi Nicolas, Hi Peter, >> I order to debug this, I was advised to use a serial console and boot >> with theses options: >> no_console_suspend=1 initcall_debug > > This good information, would you be able to assist in documenting this > in a wiki page.

[fedora-arm] Help testing suspend on arm

Hi there, While testing upstream kernel on some devices, I've recently discovered that suspend was broken for "distro kernel" (not only related to fedora kernel, but also ubuntu). I order to debug this, I was advised to use a serial console and boot with theses options: no_console_suspend=1

[fedora-arm] Re: fake hwclock

Le mer. 8 août 2018 à 16:15, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : > This is from the Centos-arm list. > > I have this running on a number of Centos7-armfhp Cubieboards. > There is a quicker workaround here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074002#c7 But it's only for battery-backed RTC. Best

[fedora-arm] Nouveau acceleration on armv7/aarch64

Hi there, FYI I've backported the tegra/nouveau support that has landed in mesa master recently on top of mesa-18.0 Here is a koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26171305 I'm testing it only on a jetson-tk1 (armv7hl) for now, using a 4.16.0 kernel. But in

[fedora-arm] Re: The 4.15 kernel rebase on stable releases

2018-02-12 18:56 GMT+01:00 Peter Robinson : > Hi All, > > Just a heads up that the 4.15 kernel is headed to stable releases. > > I did a bunch of testing over the weekend and fixed up a bunch of > issues, added some minor enhancements across a number of platforms. > There is

[fedora-arm] Re: U-Boot not working with imx6

dn't work but it turns out the new version of u-boot doesn't > work correctly if the SRC_SBMR1 value is not set. The old version figured it > out somehow. > > I modified u-boot to always boot from the MMC and now it works fine. Thanks > for your help. > > -Andrew > > On T

[fedora-arm] Re: U-Boot not working with imx6

2017-05-23 1:06 GMT+02:00 Andrew Gillis : > I am using an imx6 SoM from SolidRun. We have purchased a large number of > these and mostly they work fine. > > I tried to update to Fedora 25 and now a few of them won't boot. (most work > fine) > > All my SoMs are all supposed to

[fedora-arm] Feedback needed on wandboard single/dual

Hello, I've send a patch to u-boot upstream that enable sata on wandboard quad. This patch operates as appropriate on the device, but it also need to be tested on wandboard single/dual which don't have the sata port. (because the u-boot binary is the same for all board variants).

[fedora-arm] Re: F23 on Wandboard Quad -- kernel doesn't start?

2016-03-03 21:51 GMT+01:00 Derek Atkins : > Hi, > > I'm trying to run F23 on a Wandboard Quad, but it's not booting. It > hangs after the "Starting kernel" output. > > I followed the instructions at > >

Re: [fedora-arm] [PATCH] [ARM] Enable kernel-lpae for tegra devices

2014-08-21 21:40 GMT+02:00 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com: Why are you sending this to the list when there's already a BZ? Hi Peter, This was just a trivial rebase on top of 3.17. But after my tests the nouveau pull request was merged, so there is a need of an additional

[fedora-arm] [PATCH] [ARM] Enable kernel-lpae for tegra devices

From: Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org Move config options from config-armv7 cpu config options to config-armv7-generic so that they can be shared with kernel-lpae rhbz#1110963 --- config-armv7 | 60 ++--- config-armv7-generic | 46

[fedora-arm] [PATCH] Switch CMA to 10% RAM on armv7l and 128M on lpae/arm64

This should offer an ever better conveniant default than the default to 64M found in multi_v7_defconfig. That, before a per-board solution to be found. See rhbz#1127000 RAM CMA armv7 128M??? ~13M 256M~26M 512M~51M 1G ~102M 2G 205M

[fedora-arm] Testing CMA=64M on low memory devices (BeagleBones)

Hi, I would request beaglebones users (either Black or white) to do some tests about a possible cma=64M to be set on kernel cmdline: # sed -i 's/^ABC_BASEARGS=\(.*\)/ABC_BASEARGS=\1 cma=64M\/' /etc/sysconfig/arm-boot-config # a-b-c # reboot By default cma is set to 16 and is not enought for

[fedora-arm] [PATCH] Bump CMA to 64M by default as found in 3.15 multi_v7_defconfig

The commit d1c912c1001f was made into tegra_defconfig and later forwared to multi_v7_deconfig as 0c86f089e66a93 Quoting original commit into the kernel tree: - Allocate 64 MiB for CMA by default; the default 16MiB is not enough for the majority of use-cases. This can still be overridden by the

Re: [fedora-arm] Mythtv on fedora arm

2014-04-23 20:28 GMT+02:00 Timothy Krantz tkra...@stahurabrenner.com: Hi, This is a copy of a message I sent to the mythtv mailing list the other day. I thought there might be some interest about it here as well. Subsequent to this post I was also able to get mythtv to work on an MK802

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora ARM Status Meeting Minutes 2014-03-05

2014-03-06 0:09 GMT+01:00 Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com: Thanks to those that were able to join us for the status meeting today, for those unable the minutes are posted below: #fedora-meeting-1: Fedora ARM status meeting

[fedora-arm] ARM Tegra Toshiba AC100 Fedora 19 Remix

Hello, Here is a simplified process to install the Fedora 19 armhfp remix for the Toshiba AC100 You need to have: - The BCT retrieved from your specific AC100 device (as ac100.bct) - A mini-usb/usb cable - A sdcard at least 4GB class 10 - The Toshiba AC100 device itself. # yum install tegrarcm

Re: [fedora-arm] u-boot update testing

2013/10/21 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I have proposed https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/uboot-tools-2013.10-2.fc20 as a blocker for beta I would appreciate as many people testing it as possible and providing karma in bodhi,

[fedora-arm] Status of vanilla u-boot on tegra based paz00 aka Toshiba ac100

Hi I would like to share a recent experiment I made with u-boot v2013.04 As reported upstream, I needed to revert some patches, and add a trivial one: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-April/152397.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-April/152398.html It would be interesting

[fedora-arm] Pixie Case, - Was ARMv5 and atomic operations

2012/4/25 Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com: 2012/4/23 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz: .. I'm usually skipping such packages as there is a lot of other work on s390, but when I dealt with them I've used either the gcc or C++ primitives or the atomic_ops library. The Pixie package seems to be on my

[fedora-arm] Fwd: DirectFB fixed but not for armv5tel

Hi, I've pushed a commit that I have tested (on ARM  F-14) to fix build of directfb. The problem is that it won't work on armv5tel. Here is the error: CE  -std=gnu99 -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -c -o util.lo util.c libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../..