[fedora-arm] Re: Any update on suggested devices?

2020-11-12 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:28:49AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > In the meeting right after the F33 release, we talked about identifying a > handful of key devices and making sure anyone with a serious interest in this would be great. I have a few devices collecting dust because it was

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora LiveUSB station - brainstorming

2017-04-10 Thread Till Maas
Hi, this is awesome. I also started to think about something similar myself - just a device to be able to let people write their USB device with. My main criteria for a system that can be used by visitors was that it supports USB3 to make flashing at as fast as possible. I found the ODROID-XU4

Re: [fedora-arm] System time

2015-09-02 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Without a battery backed RTC its really not that useful. Picture 6 or 10 > months after a release, does it matter if the time is half a year to a year > off or 35 years off? If a system needs to use something TLS-protected,

Re: [fedora-arm] F18 for the Pogoplug e02

2013-04-17 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:28:12PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: which talks about F18-beta. So what do I have to do to build a F18 production image and is there anything else I need to do? Oh, the primary use of this system will be as a backup/archive server. AFAIK it will not be

Re: [fedora-arm] arm software floating point support going forward

2013-01-31 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 04:30:32PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: Fedora provides all tools to run armv5tel as say tertiary architecture, just needs a volunteer with some hardware. what is going to happen with the hardware used to build packages now for kirkwood? Regards Till

[fedora-arm] livemedia-modifier (linked in wiki) missing

2013-01-24 Thread Till Maas
Hi, on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Fedora_18_Beta/GuruPlug there is a link to http://142.204.133.82/tmp/livemedia-modifier which is supposed to be a script to change /boot from ext to vfat. But the link does not work. Can the script maybe added properly to Fedora? Regards

[fedora-arm] slow loading of initrd/kernel from ext file system on kirkwood/dockstar

2013-01-24 Thread Till Maas
Hi, I noticed that loading the kernel/initrd from an ext4 file system as it is the default on F18 Beta is very slow compared to vfat. It takes several minutes instead of seconds. Is this only the case on my dockstar? I already updated the uboot to the latest release I found on

Re: [fedora-arm] Who's using Kirkwood?

2012-10-12 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 09:46:37PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: Marvell? Asking who in particular? And what configuration. There's a lot of kirkwood chips with 128Mb or less RAM which makes it a little pointless for a Fedora image and hence IMO not relevant. A Seagate dockstar has only 128Mb

Re: [fedora-arm] Who's using Kirkwood?

2012-10-12 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 01:37:51PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: Brendan Conoboy b...@redhat.com writes: Personally I'd be fine if we consider Kirkwood to be server only (i.e. headless). So to me that implies that a lack of Libreoffice is okay. Granted, I don't know if that's okay from a

Re: [fedora-arm] Who's using Kirkwood?

2012-10-10 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 04:30:24AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: El Tue, 9 Oct 2012 08:54:26 +0100 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com escribió: On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: It seems that the disk image boots on the dockstar, but a first yum

Re: [fedora-arm] Who's using Kirkwood?

2012-10-08 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 05:43:33AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5 because it is used in the official rPi builds but that doesn't mean I'm not interested to know whether we

Re: [fedora-arm] Who's using Kirkwood?

2012-10-08 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:53:45PM -0400, Scott Sullivan wrote: On 10/08/2012 02:35 PM, Till Maas wrote: Hi, On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 05:43:33AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: I'm interested to know who is using Kirkwood, and who would miss it if it went away. For now, we won't kill off ARMv5

Re: [fedora-arm] What is the best way to fix build issues with Fedora 13 RPMs?

2011-03-09 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:07:46PM +, Gordan Bobic wrote: On 03/08/2011 09:04 PM, Till Maas wrote: On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:01:02AM +, Gordan Bobic wrote: Niels de Vos wrote: Hello all, it looks like not all Fedora 13 packages can be build on ARM yet. For some packages

Re: [fedora-arm] What is the best way to fix build issues with Fedora 13 RPMs?

2011-03-08 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:01:02AM +, Gordan Bobic wrote: Niels de Vos wrote: Hello all, it looks like not all Fedora 13 packages can be build on ARM yet. For some packages there have been tickets opened at the Trac instance: - https://fedorahosted.org/arm/report/1 I'd like to

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 12 updates still rsyncing?

2010-05-16 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 09:49:18PM -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: The Fedora-ARM builds from around F8 though F12 were built on Lennert's koji farm in Europe. That was recently decommissioned, and there's a new koji farm being built here at Seneca by Paul Whalen. The plan is to use Dennis