On 05/31/2012 01:03 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
2 reasons:
* it would be nice if people using Fedora create binaries using the
right path for the future
* the compat symlink on its own isn't enough, changing the filename
means the soname has changed too. There's a (quick and very dirt
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> El Wed, 30 May 2012 14:52:20 -0400 (EDT)
> Paul Whalen escribió:
>> Good day all,
>>
>> As many of you are aware we are not holding the Fedora ARM meeting
>> this week, but shall return t
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 09:19:51AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>On 05/31/2012 09:03 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> * the compat symlink on its own isn't enough, changing the filename
>>means the soname has changed too.
>
>Oh, yuck. I don't remember anyone thinking about that during
>the meeting.
On 05/31/2012 09:03 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> * the compat symlink on its own isn't enough, changing the filename
>means the soname has changed too.
Oh, yuck. I don't remember anyone thinking about that during
the meeting. :-(
Andrew.
___
arm m
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:49:57AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>On 05/31/2012 01:50 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>> There's one addition I would like to see to the final release criteria:
>> Updated linker path in gcc and glibc.
>
>Why is that important? We'll drop a compat symlink in anyway,
>and n
On 05/31/2012 01:50 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> There's one addition I would like to see to the final release criteria:
> Updated linker path in gcc and glibc.
Why is that important? We'll drop a compat symlink in anyway,
and no-one should notice the change.
Andrew.
___
On 05/30/2012 11:52 AM, Paul Whalen wrote:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Quality_Assurance/Final_Release_Criteria
Let's begin the discussion on the list - What do you foresee blocking us
from our final release of F17?
There's one addition I would like to see to the final rele
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Wed, 30 May 2012 14:52:20 -0400 (EDT)
Paul Whalen escribió:
> Good day all,
>
> As many of you are aware we are not holding the Fedora ARM meeting
> this week, but shall return to our regular time next Wednesday June
> 6th.
>
> Congratulations t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Wed, 30 May 2012 17:00:58 -0400
Rich Mattes escribió:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Paul Whalen
> wrote:
>
> > We have built 96% of F17, with
> > approximately 85 packages missing and 188 missing builds (this
> > including many
> > packages
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Rich Mattes wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
>
>> We have built 96% of F17, with
>> approximately 85 packages missing and 188 missing builds (this including
>> many
>> packages that have 1 or more builds in between what we have versus
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
> We have built 96% of F17, with
> approximately 85 packages missing and 188 missing builds (this including
> many
> packages that have 1 or more builds in between what we have versus PA).
> Here is the full list:
> http://arm.koji.fedoraproject
Good day all,
As many of you are aware we are not holding the Fedora ARM meeting this week,
but shall return to our regular time next Wednesday June 6th.
Congratulations to the primary architectures for their GA release of Fedora
17 on May 29th. With the successful release of the Fedora 17 Bet
12 matches
Mail list logo
