Re: [fedora-arm] GCC PR #50521

2011-11-08 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2011-11-08 klockan 15:05 -0800 skrev Brendan Conoboy: > Per our IRC conversation, the second patch in 50521, "patch to honour > STRICT_ALIGNMENT," breaks the gcc build. Midway through, xgcc is used > to generate an executable which segfaults. The build works with 50521's > "proposal patch

Re: [fedora-arm] GCC PR #50521

2011-11-09 Thread Gordan Bobic
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:44:02 +0100, Henrik Nordström wrote: > tis 2011-11-08 klockan 15:05 -0800 skrev Brendan Conoboy: > >> Per our IRC conversation, the second patch in 50521, "patch to >> honour >> STRICT_ALIGNMENT," breaks the gcc build. Midway through, xgcc is >> used >> to generate an

Re: [fedora-arm] GCC PR #50521

2011-11-09 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2011-11-09 klockan 10:05 + skrev Gordan Bobic: > Speaking of alignment, armv5 has been in need of a GCC option to force > 4-byte alignment of all arrays (including char[] arrays) and structs > since forever. Arguably, it should be on by default on arm. But I guess > that is unrelate