Re: [fedora-arm] Just in case you don't read Slashdot :)

2012-10-06 Thread Jon Masters
On 10/05/2012 07:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: For Fedora 18 with 3.7 it should (whether it works out in time or we start with F-19 and roll it back) mean we can support more devices with a couple of less kernels. The mvebu

Re: [fedora-arm] Just in case you don't read Slashdot :)

2012-10-06 Thread Peter Robinson
We're planning on a 3.7 update in F18. The thing is that this is likely to be a disruptive upgrade as certain platforms (even without a unified kernel) will need to have a working device tree. Hence, the moment there is an -rc1 to poke at, we'll make sure this is lined up. We will when

Re: [fedora-arm] Just in case you don't read Slashdot :)

2012-10-06 Thread Brendan Conoboy
On 10/06/2012 07:19 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: We're planning on a 3.7 update in F18. The thing is that this is likely to be a disruptive upgrade as certain platforms (even without a unified kernel) will need to have a working device tree. Hence, the moment there is an -rc1 to poke at, we'll make

Re: [fedora-arm] Just in case you don't read Slashdot :)

2012-10-06 Thread Jon Masters
On 10/06/2012 03:57 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 10/06/2012 07:19 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: We're planning on a 3.7 update in F18. The thing is that this is likely to be a disruptive upgrade as certain platforms (even without a unified kernel) will need to have a working device tree. Hence,

Re: [fedora-arm] Just in case you don't read Slashdot :)

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Jon Chiappetta jon.chiappe...@senecacollege.ca wrote: This looks exciting / promising! http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/10/04/1942201/linux-37-kernel-to-support-multiple-arm-platforms I'd not read that but then I was reading the commit logs for the kernel so

Re: [fedora-arm] Just in case you don't read Slashdot :)

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: For Fedora 18 with 3.7 it should (whether it works out in time or we start with F-19 and roll it back) mean we can support more devices with a couple

Re: [fedora-arm] Just in case you don't read Slashdot :)

2012-10-05 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: For Fedora 18 with 3.7 it should (whether it works out in time or we start

Re: [fedora-arm] Just in case you don't read Slashdot :)

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: For

[fedora-arm] Just in case you don't read Slashdot :)

2012-10-04 Thread Jon Chiappetta
This looks exciting / promising! http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/10/04/1942201/linux-37-kernel-to-support-multiple-arm-platforms (is this device tree blob related then? or something completely different?) Jon Chiappetta ___ arm mailing list