[fedora-arm] Re: Kraxel's Kernel and VC4

2016-10-21 Thread Aly Dharshi
Hey Paul, Yes the image is AARCH64 ! Thanks. Cheers, ASD. [https://d3pv4gq91q59qh.cloudfront.net/images/6624/30748/images/566758f91e829.jpeg?override=1449614636] Aly S Dharshi B.Sc. Computer Science, RHCE Technology Strategist m. 780 722 3461 t. 780 428 5226

[fedora-arm] Re: Kraxel's Kernel and VC4

2016-10-21 Thread Paul Whalen
- Original Message - > > > > > I have tried the Fedora 25 build and X comes up on the PI3 fine. BUT I have > found it to be rather heavy. This is my opinion but Midori works but isn't > the greatest. Firefox installs but seg faults on start up. > > I've been running firefox just

[fedora-arm] Re: Kraxel's Kernel and VC4

2016-10-21 Thread Peter Robinson
> I have tried the Fedora 25 build and X comes up on the PI3 fine. BUT I > have found it to be rather heavy. This is my opinion but Midori works but > isn't the greatest. Firefox installs but seg faults on start up. > I've been running firefox just fine on all the builds since we announced them.

[fedora-arm] Re: Kraxel's Kernel and VC4

2016-10-21 Thread Aly Dharshi
Hello Marcin, I have tried the Fedora 25 build and X comes up on the PI3 fine. BUT I have found it to be rather heavy. This is my opinion but Midori works but isn't the greatest. Firefox installs but seg faults on start up. Overall it seems that the F25 build needs a lot of tuning to run on

[fedora-arm] Re: Kraxel's Kernel and VC4

2016-10-20 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 20.10.2016 o 19:38, Aly Dharshi pisze: > I have successfully installed Fedora 24 with onto a RPI3 with Kraxel's > kit. [..] > Would anybody have any thoughts on solving this issue. I know it may not > be completely a Fedora problem especially since its not a Fedora team > built kernel.