[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-27 Thread YOUNG, MICHAEL A.
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020, Steven A. Falco wrote: > I got curious, so I just downloaded > Fedora-Xfce-Rawhide-20200127.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz and tried it. It booted > properly on my RPi4 (with 4 GB of ram). I have a working desktop, and this > time, I tried using wifi - it works too. That worked

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-27 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 1/27/20 2:54 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 1/27/20 2:26 PM, YOUNG, MICHAEL A. wrote: On Mon, 27 Jan 2020, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 1/27/20 4:10 AM, M A Young wrote:   On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, Dirk Streubel wrote:   why is RPi 4 supported on Ubuntu early than in Fedora? Is there any  

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-27 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 1/27/20 2:26 PM, YOUNG, MICHAEL A. wrote: On Mon, 27 Jan 2020, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 1/27/20 4:10 AM, M A Young wrote: On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, Dirk Streubel wrote: why is RPi 4 supported on Ubuntu early than in Fedora? Is there any different in kernel in Ubuntu? Yes, they use

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-27 Thread YOUNG, MICHAEL A.
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 1/27/20 4:10 AM, M A Young wrote: >> >> On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, Dirk Streubel wrote: >> >>> why is RPi 4 supported on Ubuntu early than in Fedora? Is there any >>> different in kernel in Ubuntu? >>> Yes, they use random vendor forks. >>> >>> Can

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-27 Thread Dirk Streubel
Am 27.01.20 um 19:30 schrieb Fred van Zwieten: > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:16 PM Steven A. Falco > wrote: > > On 1/27/20 10:56 AM, Fred van Zwieten wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:33 PM Steven A. Falco > mailto:stevenfa...@gmail.com> >

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-27 Thread Fred van Zwieten
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:16 PM Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 1/27/20 10:56 AM, Fred van Zwieten wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:33 PM Steven A. Falco > wrote: > > > > On 1/27/20 4:10 AM, M A Young wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, Dirk

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-27 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 1/27/20 10:56 AM, Fred van Zwieten wrote: On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:33 PM Steven A. Falco mailto:stevenfa...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 1/27/20 4:10 AM, M A Young wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, Dirk Streubel wrote: > >> why is RPi 4 supported on Ubuntu early than in

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-27 Thread Fred van Zwieten
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:33 PM Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 1/27/20 4:10 AM, M A Young wrote: > > > > On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, Dirk Streubel wrote: > > > >> why is RPi 4 supported on Ubuntu early than in Fedora? Is there any > >> different in kernel in Ubuntu? > >> Yes, they use random vendor forks.

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-27 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 1/27/20 4:10 AM, M A Young wrote: On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, Dirk Streubel wrote: why is RPi 4 supported on Ubuntu early than in Fedora? Is there any different in kernel in Ubuntu? Yes, they use random vendor forks. Can you say something about the timetable? Would it be possible to use the PI4

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-27 Thread M A Young
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, Dirk Streubel wrote: > why is RPi 4 supported on Ubuntu early than in Fedora? Is there any > different in kernel in Ubuntu? > Yes, they use random vendor forks. > > Can you say something about the timetable? Would it be possible to use the > PI4 with Fedora32, i mean

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4 overscan

2020-01-22 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 1/22/20 12:13 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: I'm running Fedora Rawhide on an RPi 4, and noticed that the video wasn't quite filling the monitor. Looking at Xorg.0.log, I saw: I need more context. What architecture, what image etc, what desktop environment. Custom builds etc, as we've not yet

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4 overscan

2020-01-21 Thread Peter Robinson
> I'm running Fedora Rawhide on an RPi 4, and noticed that the video wasn't > quite filling the monitor. Looking at Xorg.0.log, I saw: I need more context. What architecture, what image etc, what desktop environment. Custom builds etc, as we've not yet announced anything official around RPi4

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4 overscan

2020-01-19 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 1/19/20 1:06 PM, Benson Muite wrote: > > On 1/18/20 6:56 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: >> I'm running Fedora Rawhide on an RPi 4, and noticed that the video wasn't >> quite filling the monitor.  Looking at Xorg.0.log, I saw: >> >> Virtual size is 1824x984 (pitch 1824) >> >> I fixed that by

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-10 Thread Peter Robinson
> why is RPi 4 supported on Ubuntu early than in Fedora? Is there any > different in kernel in Ubuntu? Yes, they use random vendor forks. > Filip Bartmann > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:35:52 -0500 > "Steven A. Falco" wrote: > > > On 1/9/20 10:56 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > >> I know that the RPi

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-10 Thread filbar
Hello, why is RPi 4 supported on Ubuntu early than in Fedora? Is there any different in kernel in Ubuntu? Filip Bartmann On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:35:52 -0500 "Steven A. Falco" wrote: > On 1/9/20 10:56 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> I know that the RPi 4 is not currently supported in Fedora,

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-09 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 1/9/20 10:56 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> I know that the RPi 4 is not currently supported in Fedora, while we wait >> for upstream kernel support for the new Broadcom BCM2711 SOC. >> >> However, I now see that there is some support for the BCM2711 in kernel 5.5, >> and I also see that kernel

[fedora-arm] Re: RPi 4

2020-01-09 Thread Peter Robinson
> I know that the RPi 4 is not currently supported in Fedora, while we wait for > upstream kernel support for the new Broadcom BCM2711 SOC. > > However, I now see that there is some support for the BCM2711 in kernel 5.5, > and I also see that kernel 5.5 is in rawhide. It's been worked on. >