tor 2010-12-23 klockan 18:54 +0530 skrev tuxdna:
> If we can do that, then building packages for ARM would be faster I guess.
> ( I am not aware of various issues with buidling RPMs using cross compilers.
> )
Semi-cross builds is reasonable. That is an ARM build host using distcc
to hosts of ot
On 12/23/10 13:24, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
> Thanks for sharing these steps.
You're welcome.
>> 4) rpmbuild -ba --define "binutils_target armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi"
>> rpmbuild/SPECS/gcc.spec
>>
>> 6) rpmbuild -ba --define="cross_target armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi"
Hey Andy,
Thanks for sharing these steps.
> 4) rpmbuild -ba --define "binutils_target armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi"
> rpmbuild/SPECS/gcc.spec
>
> 6) rpmbuild -ba --define="cross_target armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi"
> rpmbuild/SPECS/gcc.spec
>
Providing cross_target and binutils_target seems to
Hi -
Here are updates I just got working of Lennert and David's patches
against current rawhide gcc and binutils:
binutils-2.20.51.0.12-2.fc15.src.rpm
gcc-4.5.1-5.fc15.src.rpm
which generate updated binutils and gcc cross packages. The old ones
are fine except that they're no longer able