[fedora-arm] Updated cross binutils and gcc patches against rawhide

2010-11-17 Thread Andy Green
Hi - Here are updates I just got working of Lennert and David's patches against current rawhide gcc and binutils: binutils-2.20.51.0.12-2.fc15.src.rpm gcc-4.5.1-5.fc15.src.rpm which generate updated binutils and gcc cross packages. The old ones are fine except that they're no longer able

Re: [fedora-arm] Updated cross binutils and gcc patches against rawhide

2010-12-23 Thread tuxdna
Hey Andy, Thanks for sharing these steps. > 4) rpmbuild -ba --define "binutils_target armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi" > rpmbuild/SPECS/gcc.spec > > 6) rpmbuild -ba --define="cross_target armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi" > rpmbuild/SPECS/gcc.spec > Providing cross_target and binutils_target seems to

Re: [fedora-arm] Updated cross binutils and gcc patches against rawhide

2010-12-23 Thread Andy Green
On 12/23/10 13:24, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Hi - > Thanks for sharing these steps. You're welcome. >> 4) rpmbuild -ba --define "binutils_target armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi" >> rpmbuild/SPECS/gcc.spec >> >> 6) rpmbuild -ba --define="cross_target armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi"

Re: [fedora-arm] Updated cross binutils and gcc patches against rawhide

2010-12-23 Thread Henrik Nordström
tor 2010-12-23 klockan 18:54 +0530 skrev tuxdna: > If we can do that, then building packages for ARM would be faster I guess. > ( I am not aware of various issues with buidling RPMs using cross compilers. > ) Semi-cross builds is reasonable. That is an ARM build host using distcc to hosts of ot