Hi all,
Is a ready-to-go F17 image available for testing the BeagleBone yet? Is
there an ETA?
- Mike
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
I am trying to help out someone that has a BBB. I am looking at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/F23/Installation
and the files referred to at:
http://pwhalen.fedorapeople.org/Fedora/23/Beta/beaglebone/
do not exist.
What is the current status for BBB and F23?
thank you.
A
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is a ready-to-go F17 image available for testing the BeagleBone yet? Is
> there an ETA?
>
> - Mike
Hi, isn't the BeagleBone using the same processor than the BeagleBoard
(same Cortex A8)
I would think that both are equ
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Kévin Raymond
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is a ready-to-go F17 image available for testing the BeagleBone yet? Is
>> there an ETA?
>>
>> - Mike
>
> Hi, isn't the BeagleBone using the same processor
On 07/12/2012 08:08 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
Hi all,
Is a ready-to-go F17 image available for testing the BeagleBone yet? Is
there an ETA?
I am making an experimental image right now. I will send a followup
email when it is ready for testing.
--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. /
On 07/12/2012 04:25 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
I am making an experimental image right now. I will send a followup
email when it is ready for testing.
Update: The image is done, but evidently not going to work. While we
have an upstream MLO/uboot solution, some of the necessary pieces for a
On 07/12/2012 09:40 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 07/12/2012 04:25 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
I am making an experimental image right now. I will send a followup
email when it is ready for testing.
Update: The image is done, but evidently not going to work. While we
have an upstream MLO/uboo
Hi All,
For those that are happy with the original BBone they're on special
here at £31.99 at the moment.
http://www.phenoptix.com/products/beagle-bone-a6-extras-rev-a6
Peter
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
Hi,
Does anyone have Fedora running on the new Beaglebone Black board?
Steve
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
On 04/30/2013 04:56 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
For those that are happy with the original BBone they're on special
here at £31.99 at the moment.
http://www.phenoptix.com/products/beagle-bone-a6-extras-rev-a6
I am going to be in England monday & tuesday, so could arrange for one
of tw
: arm-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:21:20
To: Peter Robinson
Cc:
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] BeagleBone original
On 04/30/2013 04:56 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> For those that are happy with the original BBone they're on special
> here at £31
0:21:20
To: Peter Robinson
Cc:
Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] BeagleBone original
On 04/30/2013 04:56 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
For those that are happy with the original BBone they're on special
here at £31.99 at the moment.
http://www.phenoptix.com/products/beagle-bone-a6-extras-rev
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:44 AM, wrote:
> I'm a bit confused here. This is the new Bone, not the original.
>
> In any event, the Beagleboard XM is the one with the hub. (4 usb) Also note
> that board needs a special patch. I'm just watching ther list to see when it
> is available for opensuse 12
You are correct. It took me a while to find it, but the PCDuino from
Sparkfun is the one with a direct ethernet connection rather than going
through the USB hub, Assuming I read the block diagram correctly.
https://www.sparkfun.com/products/11712
and specifically page two of the schematic
http
On 05/01/2013 01:40 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:44 AM, wrote:
I'm a bit confused here. This is the new Bone, not the original.
In any event, the Beagleboard XM is the one with the hub. (4 usb) Also note
that board needs a special patch. I'm just watching ther list to
Mine died. I put in for a RMA but have heard nothing back.
It looks like it might have messed up any flash memory it might have. I.e it
seems to load the BIOS, cause I can get a terminal open on it, but it won't
boot - so maybe a driver for the SD card is corrupt or something? I even
re-imag
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:50 AM, William Henry wrote:
> Mine died. I put in for a RMA but have heard nothing back.
>
Can you forward a copy of the e-mail you sent to the RMA team and when you
sent it?
>
> It looks like it might have messed up any flash memory it might have. I.e
> it seems to lo
- Original Message -
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:50 AM, William Henry < whe...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > Mine died. I put in for a RMA but have heard nothing back.
>
> Can you forward a copy of the e-mail you sent to the RMA team and when you
> sent it?
I used the RMA form on the website.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 3:43 PM, William Henry wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:50 AM, William Henry wrote:
>>
>> Mine died. I put in for a RMA but have heard nothing back.
>
>
> Can you forward a copy of the e-mail you sent to the RMA team and when you
>
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have Fedora running on the new Beaglebone Black board?
Not yet but I've begun working on the kernel and uboot side of things
and I should have mine this week so watch this space.
Peter
__
On 05/06/2013 08:52 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Does anyone have Fedora running on the new Beaglebone Black board?
>
> Not yet but I've begun working on the kernel and uboot side of things
> and I should have mine this week so watch this space.
>
Hey,
this is great news. Any updates here?
Matt
Hi All - What's the status of support for Fedora on Beaglebone Black? I find
references to a old version working on BBB, but nothing recently. Anyone
working on making it function?
___
arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
Hi,
I have a BeagleBone Black, original version, which has been running an
older version of Fedora just fine. I tried putting
Fedora-Xfce-armhfp-23-10-sda.raw.xz on a 32GB micro SD card, and I can't
get it to work. Most times I boot and get nothing on the screen.
However, I can make an SSH co
Hi,
It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding it back from running
at 1GHz? Is the a uboot thing, or a kernel thing, or something else? I
saw a version of uboot referred to as making the BBB run at 1GHz, but
when
Hi,
I've noticed that the beaglebone doesn't power off at shutdown with Fedora
21. Does anyone happen to know if support for this is in a mainline kernel
(so coming soon)? Or is this a bug and not expected?
If not I guess I might have to try to make a mini-remix myself.
Thanks,
Adam
_
Hi,
I installed fedora 21 on a beaglebone black, I was amazed how easy this
was and how well most things work.
I can't seem to get GPIO working, first dtc needed a patch for the -@
option, after I finally seem to got that working
I now find I have no
/sys/devices/bone_capemgr* directory.
Ca
I've got to the bottom of the issue with mSD on the BeagleBone.
Basically the GPIO_OMAP option has changed [1] in the 4.2 cycle and
this is used for card detection of the mSD card. Prior to this we
didn't have it explicitly in our config [2] so it was being selected
by something else and it was be
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 02:10:37AM +0800, Steve Underwood wrote:
> It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
> latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding it back from running
> at 1GHz? Is the a uboot thing, or a kernel thing, or something else? I
> saw a ve
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
> latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding it back from running at
> 1GHz? Is the a uboot thing, or a kernel thing, or something else? I saw a
> versi
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
>> latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding it back from running at
>> 1GHz? Is the a uboo
Hi all,
Hey Robert do you have a rc ( 3.13 ) kernel rolled?.
Regards
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Robert Nelson
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Steve Underwood
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It looks like the BeagleBone
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Nigel Sollars wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Hey Robert do you have a rc ( 3.13 ) kernel rolled?.
I do..
https://github.com/RobertCNelson/linux-dev/tree/am33x-v3.13
Just waiting for rc6 to fall, before i push it out to building farm..
The config is really minimal right n
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
>> latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding it back from running at
>> 1GHz? Is the a uboo
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Robert Nelson
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
>>> latest Fedora 20. Does anyone k
Hi Steve,
> It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
> latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding it back from running at
> 1GHz? Is the a uboot thing, or a kernel thing, or something else? I saw a
> version of uboot referred to as making the BBB run at 1GHz,
>> It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
>> latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding it back from running at
>> 1GHz? Is the a uboot thing, or a kernel thing, or something else? I saw a
>> version of uboot referred to as making the BBB run at 1GHz, but whe
Hi Peter,
On 01/22/2014 04:14 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding it back from running at
1GHz? Is the a uboot thing, or a kernel thing, or something else? I saw a
version of uboot ref
> On 01/22/2014 04:14 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding it back from running
at
1GHz? Is the a uboot thing, or a kernel thing, or something else? I saw
a
>
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>
> On 01/22/2014 04:14 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding it back from running
at
1GHz?
Hi Robert,
>> Fedora:
>> Pystone(1.1) time for 5 passes = 10.9073
>> This machine benchmarks at 4584.1 pystones/second
>
> Which governor are you using? It seems to be definitely stuck at 300Mhz
# cpupower frequency-info
analyzing CPU 0:
driver: generic_cpu0
CPUs which run at the same ha
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
>>> Fedora:
>>> Pystone(1.1) time for 5 passes = 10.9073
>>> This machine benchmarks at 4584.1 pystones/second
>>
>> Which governor are you using? It seems to be definitely stuck at 300Mhz
>
> # cpupower frequency-info
> a
Hi Robert,
On 01/22/2014 10:59 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 01/22/2014 04:14 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
It looks like the BeagleBone Black is still running at 550MHz with the
latest Fedora 20. Does anyone know what is holding
On 12/06/2014 10:59 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed that the beaglebone doesn't power off at shutdown with
Fedora 21. Does anyone happen to know if support for this is in a
mainline kernel (so coming soon)? Or is this a bug and not expected?
My Cubieboards power off at shutdown.
I
Yes, the cubieboards are completely different.
I guess what I am looking for is the equivalent for AM335x of this:
http://linux-sunxi.org/Linux_mainlining_effort
Maybe I will ask on the beagleboard list.
Adam
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
>
> On 12/06/2014 10:59 P
On 12/06/2014 11:44 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
Yes, the cubieboards are completely different.
I guess what I am looking for is the equivalent for AM335x of this:
http://linux-sunxi.org/Linux_mainlining_effort
Maybe I will ask on the beagleboard list.
You could git the current uboot and test wit
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 12/06/2014 11:44 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
>
> Yes, the cubieboards are completely different.
>
> I guess what I am looking for is the equivalent for AM335x of this:
> http://linux-sunxi.org/Linux_mainlining_effort
>
> Maybe I will ask on
On 12/07/2014 07:17 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/06/2014 11:44 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
Yes, the cubieboards are completely different.
I guess what I am looking for is the equivalent for AM335x of this:
http://linux-sunxi.org/Linux_main
> Well good to know that something else is going to push us toward getting the
> 3.19 kernel! ;)
Or just locally backport 22 patches when rc1 hits.
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
___
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
On 12/07/2014 07:28 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
Well good to know that something else is going to push us toward getting the
3.19 kernel! ;)
Or just locally backport 22 patches when rc1 hits.
I need whatever patches are needed for the Cubieboard 'fixes', like for
hdmi support...
___
>>>
>>> Well good to know that something else is going to push us toward getting
>>> the
>>> 3.19 kernel! ;)
>>
>> Or just locally backport 22 patches when rc1 hits.
>
>
> I need whatever patches are needed for the Cubieboard 'fixes', like for hdmi
> support...
Robert, this is completely off topi
On 12/07/2014 07:42 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Well good to know that something else is going to push us toward getting
the
3.19 kernel! ;)
Or just locally backport 22 patches when rc1 hits.
I need whatever patches are needed for the Cubieboard 'fixes', like for hdmi
support...
Robert, this
Thanks for this info on both lists!
Adam
On Dec 7, 2014 7:28 PM, "Robert Nelson" wrote:
> > Well good to know that something else is going to push us toward getting
> the
> > 3.19 kernel! ;)
>
> Or just locally backport 22 patches when rc1 hits.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Robert Nelson
> http://www.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Bram Van Steenlandt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed fedora 21 on a beaglebone black, I was amazed how easy this was
> and how well most things work.
Good news.
> I can't seem to get GPIO working, first dtc needed a patch for the -@
> option, after I finally seem to
op 22-01-15 18:01, Peter Robinson schreef:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Bram Van Steenlandt wrote:
Hi,
I installed fedora 21 on a beaglebone black, I was amazed how easy this was
and how well most things work.
Good news.
I can't seem to get GPIO working, first dtc needed a patch for the
Hi,
So recently I tried armhfp of Rawhide-20170120.
Things did not go smooth. First I tried Workstation, but GNOME did not
show up. I thought it is simply because BeagleBone Black is not strong
enough so I tried LXDE instead. However still no lucky after a long wait
(more than 20 minutes).
D
Hi,
I tried BB Black again on Rawhide, with compose 20170223.
In short GNOME/LXDE still not showing up after boot.
I did not find anything useful in the LXDE image boot log, but see many
tilcdc error in Workstation image boot log like the following
tilcdc 4830e000.lcdc: failed to allocate buff
Hi,
Recently I reflashed my BeagleBone Black. However, I find it simply
cannot go beyond uboot with Fedora 34 or Fedora 35.
Images I tried:
Fedora-Minimal-35-20211020.n.0.armhfp.raw.xz
Fedora-Minimal-34-1.2.armhfp.raw.xz
If I press the button when plug the power cable, it will loop forever
l
57 matches
Mail list logo
