-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i think we need to come up with a list of supported hardware.
something like https://wiki.linaro.org/Boards and
http://www.linaro.org/low-cost-development-boards/ i think we should
support the linaro boards if the make sense. in addition we should
supp
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Peter Robinson wrote:
PanadaBoard*), and probably the other 3 (Origen, Snowball, i.MX53) but
I don't know who has any of the last 3
I have the i.MX53 (FreeScale) and the matching HDMI
daughtercard setup
-- Russ herrold
___
arm
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 08:19 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> i think we need to come up with a list of supported hardware.
> something like https://wiki.linaro.org/Boards and
> http://www.linaro.org/low-cost-development-boards/ i think we should
> support the linaro boards if the make sense. in ad
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 08:19 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> i think we need to come up with a list of supported hardware.
> something like https://wiki.linaro.org/Boards and
> http://www.linaro.org/low-cost-development-boards/ i think we should
> support the linaro boards if the make sense. in addit
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 08:19 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> i think we need to come up with a list of supported hardware.
>> something like https://wiki.linaro.org/Boards and
>> http://www.linaro.org/low-cost-development-boards/ i think we shou
> The XO will be a little bit more harder to support with mainline
> Fedora as it currently doesn't have all the kernel stuff upstream
> and has binary blobs for X, but the OLPC images are pretty close.
I have stock F15 (stage4) running on my OLPC, but with the OLPC
kernel. No binary blobs for X
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:11 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> The XO will be a little bit more harder to support with mainline
>> Fedora as it currently doesn't have all the kernel stuff upstream
>> and has binary blobs for X, but the OLPC images are pretty close.
>
> I have stock F15 (stage4) running
Peter Robinson writes:
> What about support for the various Marvell plug computers?
I would hope that these are supported! They are still Armv5 hardware
(Kirkwood?)
> Peter
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Proces
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Peter Robinson writes:
>
>> What about support for the various Marvell plug computers?
>
> I would hope that these are supported! They are still Armv5 hardware
> (Kirkwood?)
The HW will still be supported but there's apparently some interes
Peter Robinson writes:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> Peter Robinson writes:
>>
>>> What about support for the various Marvell plug computers?
>>
>> I would hope that these are supported! They are still Armv5 hardware
>> (Kirkwood?)
>
> The HW will still be supported
10 matches
Mail list logo