[fedora-arm] supported hardware

2012-01-21 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 i think we need to come up with a list of supported hardware. something like https://wiki.linaro.org/Boards and http://www.linaro.org/low-cost-development-boards/ i think we should support the linaro boards if the make sense. in addition we should supp

[fedora-arm] supported hardware

2012-01-22 Thread R P Herrold
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Peter Robinson wrote: PanadaBoard*), and probably the other 3 (Origen, Snowball, i.MX53) but I don't know who has any of the last 3 I have the i.MX53 (FreeScale) and the matching HDMI daughtercard setup -- Russ herrold ___ arm

Re: [fedora-arm] supported hardware

2012-01-21 Thread Chris Tyler
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 08:19 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > i think we need to come up with a list of supported hardware. > something like https://wiki.linaro.org/Boards and > http://www.linaro.org/low-cost-development-boards/ i think we should > support the linaro boards if the make sense. in ad

Re: [fedora-arm] supported hardware

2012-01-21 Thread Jon Masters
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 08:19 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > i think we need to come up with a list of supported hardware. > something like https://wiki.linaro.org/Boards and > http://www.linaro.org/low-cost-development-boards/ i think we should > support the linaro boards if the make sense. in addit

Re: [fedora-arm] supported hardware

2012-01-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 08:19 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> i think we need to come up with a list of supported hardware. >> something like https://wiki.linaro.org/Boards and >> http://www.linaro.org/low-cost-development-boards/ i think we shou

Re: [fedora-arm] supported hardware

2012-01-22 Thread DJ Delorie
> The XO will be a little bit more harder to support with mainline > Fedora as it currently doesn't have all the kernel stuff upstream > and has binary blobs for X, but the OLPC images are pretty close. I have stock F15 (stage4) running on my OLPC, but with the OLPC kernel. No binary blobs for X

Re: [fedora-arm] supported hardware

2012-01-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:11 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> The XO will be a little bit more harder to support with mainline >> Fedora as it currently doesn't have all the kernel stuff upstream >> and has binary blobs for X, but the OLPC images are pretty close. > > I have stock F15 (stage4) running

Re: [fedora-arm] supported hardware

2012-01-23 Thread Derek Atkins
Peter Robinson writes: > What about support for the various Marvell plug computers? I would hope that these are supported! They are still Armv5 hardware (Kirkwood?) > Peter -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Proces

Re: [fedora-arm] supported hardware

2012-01-23 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: > Peter Robinson writes: > >> What about support for the various Marvell plug computers? > > I would hope that these are supported!  They are still Armv5 hardware > (Kirkwood?) The HW will still be supported but there's apparently some interes

Re: [fedora-arm] supported hardware

2012-01-23 Thread Derek Atkins
Peter Robinson writes: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: >> Peter Robinson writes: >> >>> What about support for the various Marvell plug computers? >> >> I would hope that these are supported!  They are still Armv5 hardware >> (Kirkwood?) > > The HW will still be supported