On 10/16/16, Wookey wrote:
> On 2016-10-15 16:47 -0500, J.B. Nicholson wrote:
>
>> I too believe that Debian is hosting nonfree software and integrating
>> nonfree software with free software and this is indistinguishable from
>> what
>> other distros not listed do (such as Ubuntu's GNU/Linux).
>
On 10/15/16, J.B. Nicholson wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> It's entirely possible something has changed and I am not aware of relevant
> updates on this (I don't doubt you're in touch with them far more than I
> am). Please do reply to the list with updates to this situation.
i'
On 2016-10-15 16:47 -0500, J.B. Nicholson wrote:
> I too believe that Debian is hosting nonfree software and integrating
> nonfree software with free software and this is indistinguishable from what
> other distros not listed do (such as Ubuntu's GNU/Linux).
There is a difference: Ubuntu will ins
On 10/15/2016 06:21 PM, GaCuest wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> If anyone if interested, I’ve updated the block diagram with new
> changes:
> http://george.the-petries.co.uk/shared-write-access/eoma/Block%20Diagram%20ZEOMA/Block%20Diagram%20Console%202.1.png
>
> Any suggestions/corrections are appre
Of course, you can install a fully free Debian system, but 1 single
dialog in setup wizard is a bit too little.
I would rather have the tickbox to install non-free repos somewhere deep
in preferences menu and I would certainly not host them on the
debian.org domain.
Ideally, you would only add no
Hello everyone!
If anyone if interested, I’ve updated the block diagram with new
changes:
http://george.the-petries.co.uk/shared-write-access/eoma/Block%20Diagram%20ZEOMA/Block%20Diagram%20Console%202.1.png
Any suggestions/corrections are appreciated. Thanks!
"J.B. Nicholson" writes:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> they're doing the best that they believe they can do, but they _have_
>> been told. see joey hess's very public description of the Debian
>> Charter as a "toxic document".
>
> I've seen https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/1
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
You can install an entirely free system with no non-free components.
You can also install Debian without taking account of any recommends.
But the recommends and suggests fields are still listing nonfree software,
which was the FSF's issue. Not accepting the suggestio
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 04:47:05PM -0500, J.B. Nicholson wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> I've seen https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/11/msg00174.html where
> Hess makes this statement but I haven't seen anything written by Hess
> clearly explaining why the Debian Constitu
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
they're doing the best that they believe they can do, but they _have_
been told. see joey hess's very public description of the Debian
Charter as a "toxic document".
I've seen https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/11/msg00174.html where
Hess makes this
El 15 de octubre de 2016 a las 20:33:12, Eric Duhamel
(ericxd...@gmail.com) escribió:
> A game console based on emulators and ports can be really interesting even
> before adding
> non-free software.
>
> For starters, you may be able to find public domain or even free software ROM
> for most of
>
A game console based on emulators and ports can be really interesting even
before adding non-free software.
For starters, you may be able to find public domain or even free software ROM
for most of the emulators, and they could even be shipped with the device
operating system as part of the fre
A game console based on emulators and ports can be really interesting even
before adding non-free software.
For starters, you may be able to find public domain or even free software ROM
for most of the emulators, and they could even be shipped with the device
operating system as part of the fre
A game console based on emulators and ports can be really interesting even
before adding non-free software.
For starters, you may be able to find public domain or even free software
ROM for most of the emulators, and they could even be shipped with the
device operating system as part of the free s
El 15 de octubre de 2016 a las 16:28:55, mdn
(bernardl...@openmailbox.org) escribió:
> Debian's approach of this isn't really ethical.
> Anyone has the freedom of install installing propitiatory software even
> non tech users.
>
> Including non-free software in the repository is insisting/proposing
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 03:40:10PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On 10/15/16, mdn wrote:
> > Debian's approach of this isn't really ethical.
>
> they're doing the best that they believe they can do, but they _have_
> been told. see joey hess's very public description of the Debia
Le 15/10/2016 16:40, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton a écrit :
> On 10/15/16, mdn wrote:
>> Debian's approach of this isn't really ethical.
>
> they're doing the best that they believe they can do, but they _have_
> been told. see joey hess's very public description of the Debian
> Charter as a
On 10/15/16, mdn wrote:
> Debian's approach of this isn't really ethical.
they're doing the best that they believe they can do, but they _have_
been told. see joey hess's very public description of the Debian
Charter as a "toxic document".
i've spoken to the FSF about this: from what i gather
Debian's approach of this isn't really ethical.
Anyone has the freedom of install installing propitiatory software even
non tech users.
Including non-free software in the repository is insisting/proposing
users, especially non tech ones, to give up their freedom for simplicity
without understandin
El 15 de octubre de 2016 a las 7:53:40, FaTony (fat...@fatony.net) escribió:
> What kind of games are you planning to run?
>
> Because this is very libre focused project so I assume emulators of
> proprietary hardware and proprietary games for that hardware out of the
> question.
>
My idea is to o
On 10/15/16, FaTony wrote:
> What kind of games are you planning to run?
>
> Because this is very libre focused project
it's an *ethically* focussed project of which it so happens, by way
of the four freedoms being designed around the extremely rare and
hard-to-understand *joint* combination of
21 matches
Mail list logo
