On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:25 PM, zap wrote:
> Very insightful,
thx. i just... don't explain this stuff very much any more as i
expect people to know it. also, i didn't (and still don't) get paid
for the expertise i'm aware of, so don't have an established
reputation where people would actual
On 02/15/2017 05:12 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:29 PM, John Luke Gibson
> wrote:
>> I appreciate the explanation. My premise was based on the linux sucks
>> video sequel which argued that many people thought systemd was messy
>> because it wasn't minimal
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:29 PM, John Luke Gibson wrote:
> I appreciate the explanation. My premise was based on the linux sucks
> video sequel which argued that many people thought systemd was messy
> because it wasn't minimalist enough.
>
> If the code of the init system is not getting expanded
Sorry, I just read your reply Mike. I think that answers any curiosity I had.
I appreciate it very much.
This is makes sense as I imagine it to be part of the problem GNU/Mach
is trying to solve (separating components of the system better, and
with more micro-managed permissions?).
Anyway, above
I appreciate the explanation. My premise was based on the linux sucks
video sequel which argued that many people thought systemd was messy
because it wasn't minimalist enough.
If the code of the init system is not getting expanded by interweaving
component files, that leaves me curious what it is
John Luke Gibson writes:
> Perhaps it is the idea that a linux machine should be wholly modular
> and attaching a library to a critical component of the system,
> shouldn't be a viable strategy for popularizing one's work.
>
> When a distro is forced to carry a package due to a dependency of a
>
2017-02-15 7:30 GMT+01:00 John Luke Gibson :
> Perhaps it is the idea that a linux machine should be wholly modular
> and attaching a library to a critical component of the system,
> shouldn't be a viable strategy for popularizing one's work.
>
True
>
> When a distro is forced to carry a package
