Re: [Arm-netbook] AMD considering releasing the PSP

2017-03-12 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Bonjour, Le Sun, 12 Mar 2017 21:31:27 +0200 Bill Kontos a écrit: > One can argue of going the signed firmware route for security is a > good or a bad practice and I agree with you that the unbrickable > design of the A20 is a better one, but that is irrelevant in the case

Re: [Arm-netbook] AMD considering releasing the PSP

2017-03-12 Thread Bill Kontos
One can argue of going the signed firmware route for security is a good or a bad practice and I agree with you that the unbrickable design of the A20 is a better one, but that is irrelevant in the case of Ryzen chips: They have already been taped out so we have to work with what we are given.

Re: [Arm-netbook] AMD considering releasing the PSP

2017-03-12 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Bill Kontos wrote: > asking for a full unconditional release of everything including releasing > the signed keys for loading firmware( that doesn't make any sense, if you > have a system that needs a signed key but the key is public what's

Re: [Arm-netbook] AMD considering releasing the PSP

2017-03-12 Thread Bill Kontos
We don't need to have full utilization of PSP, just ignoring it at boot sequence and not running it at all would be just fine. On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5x4hxu/we_are_amd_ >

Re: [Arm-netbook] AMD considering releasing the PSP

2017-03-12 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5x4hxu/we_are_amd_creators_of_athlon_radeon_and_other/dett0cc/ behind the scenes i've asked /u/AMD_James if AMD would like to be part of a collaboration to put a commercially-viable multi-core 64-bit RISC-V processor together, with a view *later* to AMD