Bonjour,
Le Sun, 12 Mar 2017 21:31:27 +0200
Bill Kontos a écrit:
> One can argue of going the signed firmware route for security is a
> good or a bad practice and I agree with you that the unbrickable
> design of the A20 is a better one, but that is irrelevant in the case
One can argue of going the signed firmware route for security is a good or
a bad practice and I agree with you that the unbrickable design of the A20
is a better one, but that is irrelevant in the case of Ryzen chips: They
have already been taped out so we have to work with what we are given.
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Bill Kontos wrote:
> asking for a full unconditional release of everything including releasing
> the signed keys for loading firmware( that doesn't make any sense, if you
> have a system that needs a signed key but the key is public what's
We don't need to have full utilization of PSP, just ignoring it at boot
sequence and not running it at all would be just fine.
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5x4hxu/we_are_amd_
>
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5x4hxu/we_are_amd_creators_of_athlon_radeon_and_other/dett0cc/
behind the scenes i've asked /u/AMD_James if AMD would like to be part
of a collaboration to put a commercially-viable multi-core 64-bit
RISC-V processor together, with a view *later* to AMD