On 05/03/2017 06:42 PM, zap wrote:
>
> On 05/03/2017 09:50 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:46 PM, zap wrote:
>>
bottom line it's far too expensive and quite impractical. 4GB is the
practical limit at the moment and even that's stupidly expensive
>>>
On 05/03/2017 09:50 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:46 PM, zap wrote:
>
>>> bottom line it's far too expensive and quite impractical. 4GB is the
>>> practical limit at the moment and even that's stupidly expensive
>>> relatively speaking.
>>>
>>> l.
>> Ah...
On 05/03/2017 11:30 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
>
>> Thanks Luke. This just made me realise that I should bring this up the next
>> time I run into the local maker space. I only occasionally see them, but
>> will be sure to reme
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
> Thanks Luke. This just made me realise that I should bring this up the next
> time I run into the local maker space. I only occasionally see them, but
> will be sure to remember this!
>
> Is the webpage designed for an interested maker/hacke
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Bill Kontos wrote:
> There is currently a cartel going on on ram ICs.
*sigh* now why doesn't that surprise me. i mean, DDR3 800mhz can be
done in 90nm for god's sake.
l.
_
On 03/05/17 06:00, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:05 AM, Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
I'm really really excited about a possible 100% libre RISC-V based computer.
Though I'm a backer of the most recent campaign (and can't wait to get it!
:)), I lack the knowledge/skills
There is currently a cartel going on on ram ICs. Once the chinese offered
the last american ram producing company( I forget it's name) to move its
production to China, ram pricing started climbing, the company is healthy
again and we are still seeing price hikes, so China is for once investing
in h
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:46 PM, zap wrote:
>> bottom line it's far too expensive and quite impractical. 4GB is the
>> practical limit at the moment and even that's stupidly expensive
>> relatively speaking.
>>
>> l.
>
> Ah... okay I had no idea it would be that expensive if you made it from
> s
On 05/03/2017 06:38 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:28 AM, zap wrote:
>>
>> On 05/03/2017 01:01 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>>> ---
>>> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:50
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:28 AM, zap wrote:
>
>
> On 05/03/2017 01:01 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> ---
>> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:50 PM, zap wrote:
>>> I assume that's going to be the third series of
On 05/03/2017 01:01 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> ---
> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:50 PM, zap wrote:
>> I assume that's going to be the third series of libre cards right? you
>> making a lowrisc based proces
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Bill Kontos wrote:
> http://rockchip.wikidot.com/rk3399
>
> According to this the rk3399 has support on everything. Does that mean that
> it does not have any gpl violations or blobs required ?
as best i can make out that would be a correct assessment. what i am
http://rockchip.wikidot.com/rk3399
According to this the rk3399 has support on everything. Does that mean that
it does not have any gpl violations or blobs required ?
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> ---
> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.cro
13 matches
Mail list logo
