Re: [Arm-netbook] mali gpu reverse engineering lkcl may ignore

2017-06-23 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Mike Leimon wrote: > If ARM is still as openly hostile as they appear to be towards reverse > engineering of their GPU designs, I don't think that pursuing lima > development is a very good option. I suspect that if development of the > driver resumes, they will p

Re: [Arm-netbook] mali gpu reverse engineering lkcl may ignore

2017-06-23 Thread Bill Kontos
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Mike Leimon wrote: > Honestly, I think that working together with people who are openly > developing a GPU design and who would probably be quite welcoming > of assistance from Luc would be a much better situation for him than if > he went back to trying to work

Re: [Arm-netbook] mali gpu reverse engineering lkcl may ignore

2017-06-23 Thread Mike Leimon
On 06/23/2017 11:29 AM, Bill Kontos wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, David Niklas wrote: > >> Now can we get back to how to do the reverse engineering itself? > Someone should suggest Luc to open a monthly patreon-styled donation > page for working on lima. If ARM is still as openly host

Re: [Arm-netbook] mali gpu reverse engineering lkcl may ignore

2017-06-23 Thread zap
On 06/23/2017 11:29 AM, Bill Kontos wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, David Niklas wrote: > >> Now can we get back to how to do the reverse engineering itself? > Someone should suggest Luc to open a monthly patreon-styled donation > page for working on lima. I second this notion. revers

Re: [Arm-netbook] mali gpu reverse engineering lkcl may ignore

2017-06-23 Thread Bill Kontos
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, David Niklas wrote: > Now can we get back to how to do the reverse engineering itself? Someone should suggest Luc to open a monthly patreon-styled donation page for working on lima. ___ arm-netbook mailing list arm-net

Re: [Arm-netbook] mali gpu reverse engineering lkcl may ignore

2017-06-23 Thread David Niklas
On Sun Jun 18 07:09:40 BST 2017, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl at lkcl.net wrote: > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 7:53 PM, zap wrote: > > > IF you can figure out how to reverse engineer the 3d engine, ikcl > > would be very happy I am sure. > > that used to be the case but is no longer true. ple