---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Bill Kontos wrote:
> I got to be honest here, running out of funds in a crowdfunding
> campaign and looking to make it up via bitcoin does not make me feel
> very confident.
luckily,
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Hrvoje Lasic wrote:
> when you google genesis, one of first thing it pops up is scam alert. It is
> well known fact.
i have a friend who signed up for them a while ago... it's not.
rem
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 10:33 PM, zap wrote:
> Are the shakti processors arm based
HELL no!!! why do you think they tried to bribe him to shut the
project down!! oops did i mention that on a public mailing list?
mwahahaa
> for the architecture or some new
> architecture or a different one.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Bill Kontos wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> wrote:
>> so, ahh i would say it's christmas come early but it really *is* christmas :)
>
>> unlike many people to whom i've pitched the idea of an entirely libre
>> SoC, madhu i
On 12/28/17 15:07, Mike Henry wrote:
I know you are in a desperate situation with lots of pressure, but if it sounds
too good
to be true it probably is.
I mostly just lurk on this mailing list, im a backer on the crowdsupply
campaign. I am not an expert on bitcoin or any concurrency. I just
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> ok so the past couple of updates i sent out i mentioned that there's
> no longer sufficient funds in the current campaign to further pay
> accommodation or any other living expenses. thus it is *really
> important* that i fin
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:33 AM, zap wrote:
> Are the shakti processors arm based for the architecture or some new
> architecture or a different one.
They are risc-v based
___
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk
http://lists.phcomp
MY Bad, I sent two of these by mistake. I meant to send one to Luke
exclusively... as well
On 12/28/2017 05:33 PM, zap wrote:
> Are the shakti processors arm based for the architecture or some new
> architecture or a different one.
>
> I believe you said the M class is supposed to be less than 1W
Are the shakti processors arm based for the architecture or some new
architecture or a different one.
I believe you said the M class is supposed to be less than 1W. Which
sounds absolutely insane. Dunno how they will do that, but it looks
interesting especially considering the blazing speed it say
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> so, ahh i would say it's christmas come early but it really *is* christmas :)
> unlike many people to whom i've pitched the idea of an entirely libre
> SoC, madhu instead responded, "ok sure, what would you like?".
> initiall
Luke,
I know you are a really smart guy. If this group has such a great
mining set up, why do they need people to join and give them money?
The math of this doesn't make any sense. They could use profits from
mining to buy more equipment, they shouldn't need people to give them
money, then have th
GNU Taler is a fundamentally different system than Bitcoin. Unless I
misunderstand the information on their website.
GNU Taler appears to be a third party; analogous to a credit card company
or a bank. GNU Taler could manage and secure your cash (or bitcoin) for you
and be trusted to ensure that t
On December 28, 2017 12:17:14 PM EST, Pen-Yuan Hsing
wrote:
>Interesting, I haven't heard of GNU Taler. But please excuse my
>ignorance: Reading the official website doesn't help me understand
>exactly what it is. Can you explain (or link to a good explanation)?
>
>On 28/12/17 17:11, Julie Marc
On 28 December 2017 at 17:54, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> ---
> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Sam Huntress
> wrote:
> >>would it not be worthwhile, do you think, to leverage
> > *this* opportunity
> >
> >
Interesting, I haven't heard of GNU Taler. But please excuse my
ignorance: Reading the official website doesn't help me understand
exactly what it is. Can you explain (or link to a good explanation)?
On 28/12/17 17:11, Julie Marchant wrote:
gnu taler seems sufficient to me. We don't need crypt
gnu taler seems sufficient to me. We don't need crypto currency, a way to
anonymously and securely transfer actual money should do just fine.
--
Julie Marchant
https://onpon4.github.io
On Dec 28, 2017 11:32 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Sam Huntres
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Sam Huntress wrote:
>>would it not be worthwhile, do you think, to leverage
> *this* opportunity
>
> The problem is that '*this* opportunity' absolutely screams pyramid scheme
> and shoul
>would it not be worthwhile, do you think, to leverage
*this* opportunity
The problem is that '*this* opportunity' absolutely screams pyramid scheme
and should not be trusted without solid verification that the operators of
this mining pool are making the investments they claim to be making.
On T
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Sam Huntress wrote:
> Currently Bitcoin is an insane gold-rush bubble that is frivolous and
> wasteful but it has the potential to balance out into the secure,
> distributed, democratized digital currency it was designed to be and I
> think that is something worth
Currently Bitcoin is an insane gold-rush bubble that is frivolous and
wasteful but it has the potential to balance out into the secure,
distributed, democratized digital currency it was designed to be and I
think that is something worth spending energy on.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Julie Ma
Ugh, did it again. Sorry.
On 2017年12月28日 04:13, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> it's
> too close to the exploitation i've witnessed - and my friend has
> recently uncovered clear and blatant evidence of. mining however is
> *completely* different, not least because it, in no way, *actually*
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Sam Huntress wrote:
>> if people published their private wallet addresses then yes.
> No. The entire point of public/private key pairs is that you can prove you
> own the pair without rev
> if people published their private wallet addresses then yes.
No. The entire point of public/private key pairs is that you can prove you
own the pair without revealing the private key.
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/58792/proof-of-address-ownership
We can use the bitcoin ledger (bloc
ok so this, richard, is the point i was talking about, yellow arrow.
the purple area was formerly too far to the left, leaving a very weird
shape that i wasn't happy with.
all good. ok i'll move on to checking the ground planes and power
planes. PADS has this annoying habit of, when you join up
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Jean Flamelle wrote:
> All in all, this type of speculation rewards gambling and malicious
> mass misinformation campaigns and I would not support it by
> participating.
thank you, jean, for a really informative and insightful discourse.
your arguments are preci
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Philip Hands wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> ...
>> (3) this is quite LITERALLY the opposite of a ponzi scheme. they are
>> LITERALLY making the bitcoin that underpins the entire scheme. this
>> is a completely unique approac
Bitcoin is hyper-deflated due to over speculation.
With 16.7 million bitcoin across 21 million wallets lets say averaging
1.2 wallets per person meaning very roughly ~17.5 million wallets
within a deviation of that statistic probably close to +/- 2.5
million, leaves between 1.114 btc and 0.835 btc
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
...
> (3) this is quite LITERALLY the opposite of a ponzi scheme. they are
> LITERALLY making the bitcoin that underpins the entire scheme. this
> is a completely unique approach which is actually extremely clever.
It seems to me that on
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Julie Marchant wrote:
> Sent this from the wrong email address. Please excuse the duplicate
> email. Luke: if the other email is in the moderation queue, feel free to
> just reject it, si
29 matches
Mail list logo
