Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-03 Thread Paul Boddie
On Friday 3. March 2017 01.47.49 Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Paul Boddie wrote: > > > > Source: > > https://olimex.wordpress.com/2017/02/07/fosdem-and-teres-i-update/ > > > > Some of that is specific to their laptop, but some of it seems relevant > > to any A64 de

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:36 AM, zap wrote: > > > On 03/02/2017 08:30 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > I am sure you will figure out a way. I wish you well and hope you will > find that one idea to fix your problems. > > As for the ram I wanted, 4gb is a good amount, I needn't be greedy

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread zap
On 03/02/2017 08:30 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > --- > crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:59 PM, John Luke Gibson wrote: >> On 3/2/17, zap wrote: >>> My bad again. I really failed in that respect. > 's'ok zap > >>

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread jah
On 03/03/17 01:30, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > all this was yesterday. > > so i am Not A Happy Bunny. You're doing good work. Be gentle with yourself. ___ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mail

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:59 PM, John Luke Gibson wrote: > On 3/2/17, zap wrote: >> My bad again. I really failed in that respect. 's'ok zap >> >> By the way, I hope you are feeling better. getting there > > @Zap

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Paul Boddie wrote: > On Thursday 2. March 2017 22.20.27 Siarhei Siamashka wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton >> >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:49 AM, zap wrote: >> > reverse-engineering i have come to the conclusion

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread Paul Boddie
On Thursday 2. March 2017 22.20.27 Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:49 AM, zap wrote: > > reverse-engineering i have come to the conclusion is a total - and > > > > criminal - waste of time and effo

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:37 AM, zap wrote: >> oh okay, would it support linux libre 4.9 from jxself's website by the way? > > as i've said - approximately five to eight times now - repeated both > back in august, on the maili

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:49 AM, zap wrote: > reverse-engineering i have come to the conclusion is a total - and > criminal - waste of time and effort. by the time all features are > 100% stable it's several YEARS down the li

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread John Luke Gibson
On 3/2/17, zap wrote: > > > On 03/02/2017 03:42 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> --- >> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:37 AM, zap wrote: >>> On 03/02/2017 03:33 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: --- >>

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread zap
On 03/02/2017 03:42 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > --- > crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:37 AM, zap wrote: >> On 03/02/2017 03:33 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >>> --- >>> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardw

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:27 AM, rohb...@yahoo.com wrote: > No, the rumor mill has it that Zen will scale down to 4W/core that would be very cool (literally). hopefully that's not "4W @ 200mhz clock speed" l. ___

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread rohbeck--- via arm-netbook
No, the rumor mill has it that Zen will scale down to 4W/coreĀ  -- Original message--From: Luke Kenneth Casson LeightonDate: Thu, Mar 2, 2017 01:21To: rohb...@yahoo.com;Cc: Linux on small ARM machines;Subject:Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors ---crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:14 AM, rohb...@yahoo.com wrote: > Haha, just my thought. My first impulse was "Zen @4W, yay!".0 0 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_(microarchitecture) surely you don't mean the zen processors

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread rohbeck--- via arm-netbook
Haha, just my thought. My first impulse was "Zen @4W, yay!".0 0 -- Original message--From: Luke Kenneth Casson LeightonDate: Wed, Mar 1, 2017 20:22To: Linux on small ARM machines;Cc: Subject:Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:49 AM, zap wrote:>>&g

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread zap
On 03/02/2017 03:42 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > --- > crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:37 AM, zap wrote: >> On 03/02/2017 03:33 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >>> --- >>> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardw

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:37 AM, zap wrote: > > On 03/02/2017 03:33 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> --- >> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread zap
On 03/02/2017 03:33 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > --- > crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:55 AM, zap wrote: >> >> On 03/01/2017 11:22 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >>> REVERSE-ENGINEERED. it's 200 lines of

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:55 AM, zap wrote: > > > On 03/01/2017 11:22 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> REVERSE-ENGINEERED. it's 200 lines of code for fuck's sake. > Wait its criminal? as in it is a flagrant

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-02 Thread Bill Kontos
Its a huge performance boost compared to the a20. I remember the gpd handheld with the same soc can run emulators with 3d accel up to approx ps2 levels of graphic requirements and even run windows 10 relatively smoothly. The CHIP community has managed to make ps1 games to run only with software acc

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-01 Thread zap
On 03/01/2017 11:22 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:49 AM, zap wrote: >> >> On 03/01/2017 06:58 PM, John Luke Gibson wrote: >>> And, Luke mentioned inquiries being made about using RISC-V in a 100% >>> open core board. That's probably a more longterm slightly

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-01 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
https://opencores.org/project,video_systems,common found a series of building blocks which look like they'll do the job for MPEG, H261, H263, H264 and more. VP8 and VP9 are available "on request" at zero licensing cost from google. ___ arm-netbook mail

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-01 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
http://opencores.org/project,bluespec-h264,overview found the h264. ___ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-01 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:49 AM, zap wrote: > > > On 03/01/2017 06:58 PM, John Luke Gibson wrote: >> And, Luke mentioned inquiries being made about using RISC-V in a 100% >> open core board. That's probably a more longterm slightly optimistic > > ah okay fair enough. I was just curious if he plann

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-01 Thread zap
On 03/01/2017 06:58 PM, John Luke Gibson wrote: > And, Luke mentioned inquiries being made about using RISC-V in a 100% > open core board. That's probably a more longterm slightly optimistic ah okay fair enough. I was just curious if he planned to reverse engineer ones with 8gb or more in the la

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-01 Thread zap
I know, I was talking more long term. but yes that is a good thing too. until it goes beyond. heh. any idea when the next generation ones will be announced or available for purchase? ;) On 03/01/2017 06:19 PM, Adam Van Ymeren wrote: > I believe the next generation of EOMA68 cards will use the Ro

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-01 Thread John Luke Gibson
And, Luke mentioned inquiries being made about using RISC-V in a 100% open core board. That's probably a more longterm slightly optimistic subject. On 3/1/17, Adam Van Ymeren wrote: > I believe the next generation of EOMA68 cards will use the Rockchip RK3288 > SoC. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wi

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-01 Thread Adam Van Ymeren
I believe the next generation of EOMA68 cards will use the Rockchip RK3288 SoC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockchip_RK3288 for specs on that. On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:48 PM, zap wrote: > I am curious, which processors are you considering by chance? > > If no one can tell me that's fine, but

Re: [Arm-netbook] Arm processors

2017-03-01 Thread zap
I am curious, which processors are you considering by chance? If no one can tell me that's fine, but I am just curious how much ram the highest one is as a limit/whether it is 32 bit or 64 bit and how late in the future such things are. By the way, whenever I get around to it, I intend to, buy th