On Monday, July 30, 2018, David Niklas wrote:
> Not to be an annoyance, but you seem to have been so busy that you missed
> my reply and I do think it was important.
>
>
>
Yes. Very limited time in chennai. Have to focus
--
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware:
Not to be an annoyance, but you seem to have been so busy that you missed
my reply and I do think it was important.
Thanks.
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:18:46 -0400
David Niklas wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 01:26:35 +0100
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:11 PM,
Misplaced might be an over-exaggeration.
This issue seems virtually identical to the issues with SystemD.
The establishment wants to do their own thing, after getting bored of
their own principles, eventually someone needs to build a stable fork
and all will return to normal eventually, so long
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 01:26:35 +0100
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Richard Wilbur
> wrote:
>
> >> On Jul 10, 2018, at 13:37, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> >> wrote: interestingly the bullet-points 3 and 5 are
> >> *actuallly legitimate concerns*. the
https://tech.slashdot.org/story/18/07/11/1958213/arms-own-employees-complain-about-anti-riscv-website#comments
___
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk
http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
Send large attachments to
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Elena ``of Valhalla''
wrote:
> On 2018-07-10 at 18:13:12 +0200, David Boddie wrote:
>> It's currently down - perhaps there was a public backlash, the server
>> overheated, or something
On 2018-07-10 at 18:13:12 +0200, David Boddie wrote:
> It's currently down - perhaps there was a public backlash, the server
> overheated, or something
it has been taken down by arm themselves after their own staff
complained:
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/07/10/arm_riscv_website/
--
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Richard Wilbur
wrote:
>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 13:37, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>> wrote:
>> interestingly the bullet-points 3 and 5 are *actuallly
>> legitimate concerns*. the RISC-V Foundation is over-controlled by UCB
>> Berkeley,[0] via a structure that
> On Jul 10, 2018, at 13:37, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> interestingly the bullet-points 3 and 5 are *actuallly
> legitimate concerns*. the RISC-V Foundation is over-controlled by UCB
> Berkeley,[0] via a structure that is similar to the failed Google Project
> Ara ("it's open as long
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 5:13 PM, David Boddie wrote:
> This site popped up on the radar for me this morning.
yeah. interestingly the bullet-points 3 and 5 are *actuallly
legitimate concerns*. the RISC-V Foundation is over-controlled by UCB
Berkeley, via a structure that is similar to the
This site popped up on the radar for me this morning.
It's currently down - perhaps there was a public backlash, the server
overheated, or something - but at least the Internet Archive still has a
copy:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180710130206/https://riscv-basics.com/
Time to start a
11 matches
Mail list logo
