Re: Assassination message dated "Thu, 05 Oct 2000 14:35:26 -0700."

2000-10-05 Thread Sourav K. Mandal
"Alex Tabarrok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" wrote: > Are there any good reasons for an anti-assassination policy? Let us consider two situations: * Not quite war (Cuba, Serbia until last week, Cold War USSR, etc.): Killing a leader will only make him a martyr, esp. if he has a strong popular mand

Re: Assassination

2000-10-05 Thread GMUresearch
In a message dated 10/5/00 5:54:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Harry Browne, the libertarian candidate, said that the way a free society would handle war is to offer a prize to the person or persons who assassinated the leader(s) of the opposing country. (..) This pr

Japan

2000-10-05 Thread Alex Tabarrok
Not that long ago there were many books and articles expounding on how great Japan was, how the Japanese model was supplanting the US model, the greatness of MITI etc. Obviously, all of this looks terrible naive today. Does anyone recall some of the key examples of this Japan triumphant lite

Assassination

2000-10-05 Thread Alex Tabarrok
In the presidential debates the other night, Harry Browne, the libertarian candidate (did you think I would waste my time watching Bush and Gore?), said that the way a free society would handle war is to offer a prize to the person or persons who assassinated the leader(s) of the opposing count

Re: Card/Krueger Revisited

2000-10-05 Thread Bryan Caplan
George Berger wrote: > > Bryan > > I am astounded that you would rate Card/Krueger's papers as high quality > work. If any one of us had submitted a paper to the AER (or other top > journal) where the relevant unregulated margins that Peter spoke of were not > properly controlled and where s

Personality, Politics, and Economics Test

2000-10-05 Thread Bryan Caplan
I've got a little announcement. I've just finished writing the first version of my Personality, Politics, and Economics online test. I think you'll have fun taking it, and it should only take ten minutes or so. The test is at: http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/cgi/person.cgi P.

Re: Card/Krueger Revisited

2000-10-05 Thread George Berger
Bryan I am astounded that you would rate Card/Krueger's papers as high quality work. If any one of us had submitted a paper to the AER (or other top journal) where the relevant unregulated margins that Peter spoke of were not properly controlled and where sloppy data collection over the telep

RE: Card/Krueger Revisited

2000-10-05 Thread Seth Giertz
Title: Below is the abstract and link to a paper that addresses Card & Krueger's work. The same authors have articles on the minimum wage coming out in the JoLE and the SEJ. [Burkhauser, R.V. ,Couch, K.A. Wittenburg, D. Who minimum Wage Increases Bite: An Analysis Using Monthly Data from th

Rybczynski theorem, was Card/Krueger Revisited

2000-10-05 Thread dmccarthy
I've just come back to the office after a while on the road and noticed Bryan's post on the Mariel boat lift and the response that mentioned the Rybczynski theorem. If anyone is interested, I recently read an interesting NBER paper on the Rybczynski theorem and immigration by Gordon Hanson and Mat

Re: Card/Krueger Revisited

2000-10-05 Thread Bryan Caplan
Alexander Robert William Robson wrote: > Isn't one of the most important parts of doing "quality" empirical work > the proper collection of data? Hasn't it been estabished that > the C-K failed this test miserably? Other than the circular argument that "they didn't collect data properly becaus