It might be worth adding to this discussion that Skeptical Inquirer's
objective is to call attention to claims of dubious scientific merit so that
they can be given further scrutiny. My reading of the article in question is
not that it is attacking the methods of econometrics, but rather notin
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:11:07 -0700 (MST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> There isn't anything substantive here. . .
>
> Chris Auld
I think the point the article makes is an important one. In general,
regardless of how sophisticated someone's econometrics work is, other
economists almost alway
