Re: RU-486

2000-10-02 Thread Gizmoleon
To think of permitting death as a "forgone opportunity cost" does not seem to be a subject that should be discussed. Personally, I agree with the critics who cite that this drug will lead to increased abortions due to its ease of access and other factors. This will certainly be a welcome subs

Re: RU-486

2000-10-02 Thread Bryan Caplan
dmccarthy wrote: > > Bryan, whats the story with this? It's a French abortion drug right? Was the > delay wholly due to political pressure? I'm unsure of whether its approved > in Britain but I thought there would've been a huge amount of climical data > available to the FDA since millions of Eur

RE: RU-486

2000-10-02 Thread M.A. Johnson
McCarthy Was the delay wholly due to political pressure? MJ It takes the MONOPOLY (unconstitutional) FDA ten years and a company's $300 million on average. Regard$, --MJ Regulation - which is based on force and fear - undermines the moral base of business dealings. It becomes cheaper to br

RE: RU-486

2000-09-29 Thread dmccarthy
Bryan, whats the story with this? It's a French abortion drug right? Was the delay wholly due to political pressure? I'm unsure of whether its approved in Britain but I thought there would've been a huge amount of climical data available to the FDA since millions of Europeans have used it. Donald

RE: RU-486

2000-09-29 Thread Gray, Lynn
No, you are right no apology. However perhaps in an additional ten years the FDA will issue an apology for the "forgone opportunity costs" of all the children killed by this drug. Lynn Gray -Original Message- From: Bryan Caplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 2