Re: [ARMedslack] Problem with Linux 2.6.36.3 packages

2011-01-21 Thread Stuart Winter
shouldnt have to DD the whole disk as zero just the first few blocks.. e what i tried at least for a few other problems... I know - but mdadm was still taking /dev/sda even *without* partitions. I'm guessing somehow, somewhere, there was some residue from when the disc may have been in a

Re: [ARMedslack] Problem with Linux 2.6.36.3 packages

2011-01-21 Thread John O'Donnell
On 01/21/2011 08:48 AM, Stuart Winter wrote: shouldnt have to DD the whole disk as zero just the first few blocks.. e what i tried at least for a few other problems... I know - but mdadm was still taking /dev/sda even *without* partitions. I'm guessing somehow, somewhere, there was some

Re: [ARMedslack] Problem with Linux 2.6.36.3 packages

2011-01-21 Thread Stuart Winter
*shrug* You should write to the mdadm writers as that is really weird . I would hav zeroed and started from there. There are asking for failure! That was the plan - reinstall and get a working system by putting mdadm-2.6 into the installer, boot into the new OS and start working out why 3.x