The Slumdog debate is a stink of a different kind

 Farwa Imam Ali
<http://www.expressbuzz.com/edition/searchresult.aspx?AliasName=SJiqCInGvNVym5sHMssKEw==>
First Published : 01 Mar 2009 10:13:00 AM IST
Last Updated : 28 Feb 2009 10:45:17 AM IST

Rahman wins two Oscars, a Golden Globe, bags a BAFTA and sends more desis to
watch Slumdog Millionaire. High on the Jai Ho spirit, a friend’s husband
buys wife dearest tickets to Slumdog Millionaire for her birthday. Wife goes
to the movies but returns home upset about how India has been portrayed.
Husband defends right to creative enterprise. Both of them fight. Patriotism
is defined in terms I have never heard of before. Two days later both stick
to their opinions, but make up. Happy ending, true filmy style.

With Rahman’s big win for India at the Oscars, perhaps the drama surrounding
what I think is just another melodrama called Slumdog Millionaire will
abate. Techies in LA believe that few would have cared had the film not won
critical acclaim, whatever that means! What did they think about the film?
Sure they squirmed at the raw depiction of poverty in Mumbai’s underbelly,
but agreed that the film simply depicts an existing reality.

So the point is, maybe we are more upset the film is more fact than fiction.
And maybe one would have felt less upset had an Indian made the film. As
some Silicon Valley desis pointed out, the writer of the book that became
the movie, Vikas Swarup, is Indian. Is it the Raj hangover that perhaps
causes us to be upset that an Englishman portrayed a realistic slice of our
life? Or is it guilt on our parts that the world sees the inequities that
exist in a supposedly shining India?

Make no mistake, I love my country potholes, corruption hell holes and all,
Oscar or no Oscar. But the Slumdog debate creates a stink of a different
kind. One of low tolerance for things harsh and real. Appears to me that
some of us would rather see the happy-ending movies with crappy humor and
not be reminded of the graver issues that exist. Are we upset that the film
does not provide yet another entertaining escape from the travails of our
daily life? Perhaps.

But over and above, I think we miss the point sometimes. As a group of Sili
Valley families watching the Oscars observed, the sheer “kuch bhi karega”
attitude that is so very Indian shines beautifully in the film. It is the
attitude that is embodied in the spirit of every Indian who is trying to
make the best of the cards life has dealt us. Made me think they were
drawing parallels from their personal travails.

Exactly what then, does Silicon Valley see in Slumdog? They see themselves.
They see the sheer spunk of Jamal who does whatever it takes to realise even
the most impossible dream. Not all the folks who realise their dreams are
lucky enough to have family and finances in their favour. Yet they
persevere. It is the story of perseverance that unites Jamal’s character
with some Sili Valley folks.

As for the poverty, the desis point out, it exists everywhere. Even in
America. Back in Boyle’s own Britain. Everywhere. It differs in perspective
and degree. But it exists everywhere. In India we call call them beggars or
bhikari. The West call them homeless. I don’t know what they call them in
Danny Boyle’s country, but I bet the underlying concept and the ignominy
attached to it is the same as it is in India.

To its merit, Slumdog is not patronising about the India scape. It sees what
is, and shows as is. And who are those protesting? The ones that spend
more movie
tickets<http://www.expressbuzz.com/edition/story.aspx?Title=The+Slumdog+debate+is+a+stink+of+a+different+kind&artid=7INRJJrOMkE=&Title=The+Slumdog+debate+is+a+stink+of+a+different+kind&SectionID=f4OberbKin4=&MainSectionID=f4OberbKin4=&SEO=slumdog&SectionName=cxWvYpmNp4fBHAeKn3LcnQ==#>than
the average slum kid does on candy for a decade? Like one desi techie
who is returning to India put it, “Boyle or no Boyle. Oscar or not. I love
my country, slums and all.” Now that’s the spirit that warrants a shout out.
Jai Ho!
http://www.expressbuzz.com/edition/story.aspx?Title=The+Slumdog+debate+is+a+stink+of+a+different+kind&artid=7INRJJrOMkE=&Title=The+Slumdog+debate+is+a+stink+of+a+different+kind&SectionID=f4OberbKin4=&MainSectionID=f4OberbKin4=&SEO=slumdog&SectionName=cxWvYpmNp4fBHAeKn3LcnQ
==
-- 
regards,
Vithur

Reply via email to