_
>
> From: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of sri vijay
> Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 10:01 PM
> To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [arr] Confused over "Rahman himself taking 30"
>
>
> GUYZ IM SORRY TO
Hey,,,the last I heard was 2 crores...
Thanks
Satish
From: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sri
vijaySent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 10:01 PMTo:
arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [arr] Confused over "Rahman
himself taking 30"
GUYZ I
GUYZ IM SORRY TO ASK LIKE THIS..BUT I REALLY WANTED TO KNOW ..HOW MUCH OF MONEY OUR ARR EARN FOR A MOVIE..COULD U GUYZ PLZ LET ME KNOW ..THKZ A LOT
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
Explore, Experience, Enjoy A.R.Rahman - The Man, The Music, The Ma
hey yar i think . its 3 crores for rahman.out of 50 crores for shivaji may be that when he typed in the news he made a mistake of typing 30 instead of 3.
On 2/26/06, mathew scaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Its all stupid news yaar how can it be 30 crores forARR and t
Its all stupid news yaar how can it be 30 crores for
ARR and that too for a rajni Movie gosh i cant believe
what sort of bull shit news we all are made to belive
--- || V i s h w e s h || <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thats impossible... 30 crores of 50 for music
> director? how will shankar manage
If ARR charges 30 Cr per movie he would not have built AM Studio, but
would have bought Virgin Records shortly ;)
-R
--- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, krishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I suspect, this post has been preponed by 40 days.
>
> On 2/23/06, Pankaj Kakkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Relax guys..
that must 3.
30 must be a typo.
OR all absolute trash news.
--- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Pankaj Kakkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> hi frnds
> the news that says arr's fees 30cr out of 50cr in sivaji does not
look a news reg. fees but sounds something like harshad meh
I suspect, this post has been preponed by 40 days.On 2/23/06, Pankaj Kakkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi frnds the news that says arr's fees 30cr out of 50cr in sivaji does not look a news reg. fees but sounds something like harshad mehta's stock scam
if arr cud get 30 then he will not s
hi frnds the news that says arr's fees 30cr out of 50cr in sivaji does not look a news reg. fees but sounds something like harshad mehta's stock scam if arr cud get 30 then he will not stop with just doing music but will produce his own musical film with help of ace technicians in the movie w
Hi guys,
Why should we discuss about the pays given to various people. We are here to discuss about music rather than money.
-- With Regards,Sudarsan RengarajanMobile: 98809 41422.
On 2/23/06, Mohamed Amin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
then what about Rajini's fee? Is he acting for charity? Absol
then what about Rajini's fee? Is he acting for charity? Absolute nonsense.All crappy substances have been written by media because of the hype. All they want is to write something about Sivaji. Instead they end up doing stupidity. || V i s h w e s h || <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thats impossib
: [arr] Confused over
"Rahman himself taking 30"Thats impossible... 30 crores
of 50 for music director? how will shankar manage other stuff in 20? Its
illogical...Shah Navas G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can
anybody think of what could be that?http://www.andhracafe
Thats impossible... 30 crores of 50 for music director? how will shankar manage other stuff in 20? Its illogical...Shah Navas G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can anybody think of what could be that?http://www.andhracafe.com/index.php?m=show&id=4403 Is Sivaji fifty crores? Updated: 02-22-2
13 matches
Mail list logo
