Axton,
you're right, there is a mismatch. The CFLAGS settings tells gcc to
generate 32-Bit object files. But in LDFLAGS -m32 wasn't set. The
linker is then trying to generate a 64-Bit binary. But libar.so is
definitely a 32-bit binary. The 64 bit version is named libar_lx64.so
Kind
Glad to hear you got it working; much easier than compiling a compiler and
running into the same problem with the new compiler :)
Axton Grams
The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in
this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My
voluntary
Hi,
Do you get a diffrent behviour if you do the same operation in a filter?
--
Jarl
2009/8/20 Jonas Stumph Stevnsvig jonas.stumph.stevns...@bec.dk:
**
Hi guys, (is it going to be Jarl to the rescue again :-D)
I have a weird bahviour in a vendor form:
I have a Date field, which fails
Hi,
We are having one Mid Tier 7.1 patch 7 instance running ARServer 7.1 p7
(assignment,email engine,approval patch 7, aie patch 6) with
Asset/CMDB2.1/ITSM application 7.0.03 with Oracle 10g as
database.
The Mid tier instance is running in a dedicated localzone in the Sun
solaris 10 machine
4 matches
Mail list logo